The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electron Affinities of the DNA and RNA Bases
Abstract
Adiabatic electron affinities (AEAs) for the DNA and RNA bases are predicted by using a range of density functionals with a double-zeta plus polarization plus diffuse (DZP++) basis set in an effort to bracket the true EAs. Although the AEAs exhibit moderate fluctuations with respect to the choice of functional, systematic trends show that the covalent uracil (U) and thymine (T) anions are bound by 0.05-0.25 eV while the adenine (A) anion is clearly unbound. The computed AEAs for cytosine (C) and guanine (G) oscillate between small positive and negative values for the three most reliable functional combinations (BP86, B3LYP, and BLYP), and it remains unclear if either covalent anion is bound. AEAs with B3LYP/TZ2P++ single points are 0.19 (U), 0.16 (T), 0.07 (G), -0.02 (C), and -0.17 eV (A). Favorable comparisons are made to experimental estimates extrapolated from photoelectron spectra data for the complexes of the nucleobases with water. However, experimental values scaled from liquid-phase reduction potentials are shown to overestimate the AEAs by as much as 1.5 eV. Because the uracil and thymine covalent EAs are in energy ranges near those of their dipole-bound counterparts, preparation and precise experimental measurement of the thermodynamically stable covalent anions may prove challenging.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Oxidative DNA damage through long-range electron transfer
Hall, D. B., Holmlin, R. E., & Barton, J. K. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/382731a0 · Cited by 825
Cited by
Atomic and Molecular Electron Affinities: Photoelectron Experiments and Theoretical Computations
Rienstra-Kiracofe, J. C., Tschumper, G. S., Schaefer, H. F., Nandi, S., & Ellison, G. B. (2002) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr990044u · Cited by 1,258
Self-citationKamerlin, S. C. L., Haranczyk, M., & Warshel, A. (2009) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp8071712 · Cited by 281
Electron-Induced Elimination of the Bromide Anion from Brominated Nucleobases. A Computational Study
Chomicz, L., Rak, J., & Storoniak, P. (2012) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp3008738 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Wesolowski, S. S., Leininger, M. L., Pentchev, P. N., & Schaefer, H. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2001-04-07
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4023-4028
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2022938478
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.