The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Quantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides1
Abstract
ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVArticleNEXTQuantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides1C. Gardner Swain and Carleton B. ScottCite this: J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 1, 141–147Publication Date (Print):January 1, 1953Publication History Published online1 May 2002Published inissue 1 January 1953https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ja01097a041https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01097a041research-articleACS PublicationsRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views2565Altmetric-Citations544LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose Get e-Alerts
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pearson, R. G. (1963) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00905a001 · Cited by 10,475
Protein adducts: quantitative and qualitative aspects of their formation, analysis and applications
Törnqvist, M., Fred, C., Haglund, J., Helleberg, H., Paulsson, B., & Rydberg, P. (2002) · Journal of Chromatography B · doi:10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00172-1 · Cited by 332
Chemoselectivity and the Curious Reactivity Preferences of Functional Groups
Afagh, N. A., & Yudin, A. K. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200901317 · Cited by 320
Formation and signaling actions of electrophilic lipids
Schopfer, F. J., Cipollina, C., & Freeman, B. A. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200131e · Cited by 299
Factors Affecting Protein Thiol Reactivity and Specificity in Peroxide Reduction
Ferrer-Sueta, G., Manta, B., Botti, H., Radi, R., Trujillo, M., & Denicola, A. (2011) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx100413v · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Swain, C. G., & Scott, C. B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 1953-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 141-147
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2322902045
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja01097a041
- The paper
- Swain, C. G., & Scott, C. B. (1953). Quantitative Correlation of Relative Rates. Comparison of Hydroxide Ion with Other Nucleophilic Reagents toward Alkyl Halides, Esters, Epoxides and Acyl Halides1. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01097a041
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
