Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 281

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stereoelectronic Effects and General Trends in Hyperconjugative Acceptor Ability of σ Bonds

Alabugin, Igor V., Zeidan, Tarek A.·2002·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A systematic study of general trends in sigma acceptor properties of C-X bonds where X is a main group element from groups IVa-IIa is presented. The acceptor ability of the C-X sigma bonds in monosubstituted ethanes increases when going to the end of a period and down a group. Enhancement of acceptor ability of C-X sigma bonds as one moves from left to right in periods parallels the increase in electronegativity of X, whereas augmentation of acceptor ability in groups is opposite to the changes in electronegativity of X and in the C-X bond polarization, following instead the decrease in the energy of sigma(C)(-)(X) orbitals when one moves from the top to the bottom within a group. This simple picture of acceptor ability of sigma bonds being controlled by electronegativity in periods and by sigma orbital energy in groups is changed in monosubstituted ethenes where the role of electronegativity of the substituent X becomes more important due to increased overlap between sigma orbitals. The combination of several effects of similar magnitude influences acceptor ability of sigma bonds in monosubstituted ethenes in a complex way. As a result, the acceptor ability of sigma bonds can be significantly modified by substitution and is conformer dependent. Stereoelectronic effects displayed by C-X bonds with X from second and third periods are highly anisotropic. For example, C-chalcogen bonds are excellent sigma acceptors at the carbon end but poor sigma acceptors at the chalcogen end. This effect can be relied upon in the design of molecular diodes with sigma bridges with unidirectional electron conductivity. While the general trends revealed in this work should be useful for the qualitative understanding of stereoelectronic effects, one should bear in mind that the magnitude of hyperconjugative effects is extremely sensitive to small variations in structure and in substitution. This advocates for the increased role of theoretical methods in analysis of stereoelectronic effects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja012633z

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 281

Metadata

Authors
Alabugin, I. V., & Zeidan, T. A.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2002-03-01
Volume
124
Issue
12
Pages
3175-3185
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2066103357
Cited by
281
References
1
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.