The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Theoretical Studies To Understand Surface Chemistry on Carbon Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: How Does Vinylene Carbonate Play Its Role as an Electrolyte Additive?
Abstract
To elucidate the role of vinylene carbonate (VC) as a solvent additive in organic polar solutions for lithium-ion batteries, reductive decompositions for vinylene carbonate (VC) and ethylene carbonate (EC) molecules have been comprehensively investigated both in the gas phase and in solution by means of density functional theory calculations. The salt and solvent effects are incorporated with the clusters (EC)nLi+(VC) (n = 0-3), and further corrections that account for bulk solvent effects are added using the polarized continuum model (PCM). The electron affinities of (EC)nLi+(VC) (n = 0-3) monotonically decrease when the number of EC molecules increases; a sharp decrease of about 20.0 kcal/mol is found from n = 0 to 1 and a more gentle variation for n > 1. For (EC)nLi+(VC) (n = 1-3), the reduction of VC brings about more stable ion-pair intermediates than those due to reduction of the EC molecule by 3.1, 6.1, and 5.3 kcal/mol, respectively. This finding qualitatively agrees with the experimental fact that the reduction potential of VC in the presence of Li salt is more negative than that of EC. The calculated reduction potentials corresponding to radical anion formation are close to the experimental potentials determined with cyclic voltammetry on a gold electrode surface (-2.67, -3.19 eV on the physical scale for VC and EC respectively vs experimental values -2.96 and -2.94 eV). Regarding the decomposition mechanisms, the VC and EC moieties undergo homolytic ring opening from their respective reduction intermediates, and the energy barrier of VC is about one time higher than that of EC (e.g., 20.1 vs 8.8 kcal/mol for (EC)2Li+(VC)); both are weakly affected by the explicit solvent molecules and by a bulk solvent represented by a continuum model. Alternatively, starting from the VC-reduction intermediate, the ring opening of the EC moiety via an intramolecular electron-transfer transition state has also been located; its barrier lies between those of EC and VC (e.g., 17.2 kcal/mol for (EC)2Li+(VC)). On the basis of these results, we suggest the following explanation about the role that VC may play as additive in EC-based lithium-ion battery electrolytes; VC is initially reduced to a more stable intermediate than that from EC reduction. One possibility then is that the reduced VC decomposes to form a radical anion via a barrier of about 20 kcal/mol, which undergoes a series of reactions to give rise to more active film-forming products than those resulting from EC reduction, such as lithium divinylene dicarbonate, Li-C carbides, lithium vinylene dicarbonate, R-O-Li compound, and even oligomers with repeated vinylene and carbonate-vinylene units. Another possibility starting from the VC-reduction intermediate is that the ring opening occurs on the unreduced EC moiety instead of being on the reduced VC, via an intramolecular electron transfer transition state, the energy barrier of which is lower than that of the former, in which VC just helps the intermediate formation and is not consumed. The factors that determine the additive functioning mechanism are briefly discussed, and consequently a general rule for the selection of electrolyte additive is proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
An, S. J., Li, J., Daniel, C., Mohanty, D., Nagpure, S., & Wood, D. L. (2016) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.008 · Cited by 2,121
Review on modeling of the anode solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) for lithium-ion batteries
Wang, A., Kadam, S., Li, H., Shi, S., & Qi, Y. (2018) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-018-0064-0 · Cited by 1,639
Electrode–electrolyte interfaces in lithium-based batteries
Yu, X., & Manthiram, A. (2018) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c7ee02555f · Cited by 649
Michan, A. L., Parimalam, B. S., Leskes, M., Kerber, R. N., Yoon, T., Grey, C. P., & Lucht, B. L. (2016) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02282 · Cited by 541
Chai, J., Liu, Z., Ma, J., Wang, J., Liu, X., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Cui, G., & Chen, L. (2017) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.201600377 · Cited by 538
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Nakamura, S., Tasaki, K., & Balbuena, P. B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-03-30
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4408-4421
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2040258796
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Studies To Understand Surface Chemistry on Carbon Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: How Does Vinylene Carbonate Play Its Role as an Electrolyte Additive? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja017073i
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Nakamura, S., Tasaki, K., & Balbuena, P. B. (2002). Theoretical Studies To Understand Surface Chemistry on Carbon Anodes for Lithium-Ion Batteries: How Does Vinylene Carbonate Play Its Role as an Electrolyte Additive? Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja017073i
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.