The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrafast Decay of Electronically Excited Singlet Cytosine via a π,π* to nO,π* State Switch
Abstract
Singlet fluorescence lifetimes of adenosine, cytidine, guanosine, and thymidine, determined by femtosecond pump-probe spectroscopy (Pecourt, J.-M. L.; Peon, J.; Kohler, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 9348. Pecourt, J.-M. L.; Peon, J.; Kohler, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 10370), show that the excited states produced by 263 nm light in these nucleosides decay in the subpicosecond range (290-720 fs). Ultrafast radiationless decay to the ground state greatly reduces the probability of photochemical damage. In this work we present a theoretical study of isolated cytosine, the chromophore of cytidine. The experimental lifetime of 720 fs indicates that there must be an ultrafast decay channel for this species. We have documented the possible decay channels and approximate energetics, using a valence-bond derived analysis to rationalize the structural details of the paths. The mechanism favored by our calculations and the experimental data involves (1) a two-mode decay coordinate composed of initial bond length inversion followed by internal vibrational energy redistribution (IVR) to populate a carbon pyramidalization mode, (2) a state switch between the pi,pi* and nO,pi* (excitation from oxygen lone pair) excited states, and (3) decay to the ground state through a conical intersention. A second decay path through the nN,pi* state (excitation from the nitrogen lone pair), with a higher barrier, involves out-of-plane bending of the amino substituent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
DNA Excited-State Dynamics: From Single Bases to the Double Helix
Middleton, C. T., de La Harpe, K., Su, C., Law, Y. K., Crespo-Hernández, C. E., & Kohler, B. (2009) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.physchem.59.032607.093719 · Cited by 827
Self-citationImprota, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Self-citationProgress and Challenges in the Calculation of Electronic Excited States
González, L., Escudero, D., & Serrano‐Andrés, L. (2012) · ChemPhysChem · doi:10.1002/cphc.201100200 · Cited by 429
Efficient Deactivation of a Model Base Pair via Excited-State Hydrogen Transfer
Schultz, T., Samoylova, E., Radloff, W., Hertel, I. V., Sobolewski, A. L., & Domcke, W. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104038 · Cited by 366
Perun, S., Sobolewski, A. L., & Domcke, W. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja044321c · Cited by 324
Metadata
- Authors
- Ismail, N., Blancafort, L., Olivucci, M., Kohler, B., & Robb, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-05-25
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 6818-6819
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2064526317
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrafast Decay of Electronically Excited Singlet Cytosine via a π,π* to nO,π* State Switch. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0258273
- The paper
- Ismail, N., Blancafort, L., Olivucci, M., Kohler, B., & Robb, M. A. (2002). Ultrafast Decay of Electronically Excited Singlet Cytosine via a π,π* to nO,π* State Switch. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0258273
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.