The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Influencing Receptor−Ligand Binding Mechanisms with Multivalent Ligand Architecture
Abstract
Multivalent ligands can function as inhibitors or effectors of biological processes. Potent inhibitory activity can arise from the high functional affinities of multivalent ligand-receptor interactions. Effector functions, however, are influenced not only by apparent affinities but also by alternate factors, including the ability of a ligand to cluster receptors. Little is known about the molecular features of a multivalent ligand that determine whether it will function as an inhibitor or effector. We envisioned that, by altering multivalent ligand architecture, ligands with preferences for different binding mechanisms would be generated. To this end, a series of 28 ligands possessing structural diversity was synthesized. This series provides the means to explore the effects of ligand architecture on the inhibition and clustering of a model protein, the lectin concanavalin A (Con A). The structural parameters that were varied include scaffold shape, size, valency, and density of binding elements. We found that ligands with certain architectures are effective inhibitors, but others mediate receptor clustering. Specifically, high molecular weight, polydisperse polyvalent ligands are effective inhibitors of Con A binding, whereas linear oligomeric ligands generated by the ring-opening metathesis polymerization have structural properties that favor clustering. The shape of a multivalent ligand also influences specific aspects of receptor clustering. These include the rate at which the receptor is clustered, the number of receptors in the clusters, and the average interreceptor distance. Our results indicate that the architecture of a multivalent ligand is a key parameter in determining its activity as an inhibitor or effector. Diversity-oriented syntheses of multivalent ligands coupled with effective assays that can be used to compare the contributions of different binding parameters may afford ligands that function by specific mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Colorimetric Method for Determination of Sugars and Related Substances
DuBois, M., Gilles, K. A., Hamilton, J. K., Rebers, P. A., & Smith, F. (1956) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60111a017 · Cited by 52,269
Intracellular Functions of N-Linked Glycans
Helenius, A., & Aebi, A. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.291.5512.2364 · Cited by 2,405
Cited by
Targeting RNA structures with small molecules
Childs-Disney, J. L., Yang, X., Gibaut, Q. M. R., Tong, Y., Batey, R. T., & Disney, M. D. (2022) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-022-00521-4 · Cited by 587
Ladmiral, V., Mantovani, G., Clarkson, G. J., Cauet, S., Irwin, J. L., & Haddleton, D. M. (2006) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja058364k · Cited by 586
Glycomimetics versus Multivalent Glycoconjugates for the Design of High Affinity Lectin Ligands
Cecioni, S., Imberty, A., & Vidal, S. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500303t · Cited by 544
Glycopolymer probes of signal transduction
Kiessling, L. L., & Grim, J. C. (2013) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60097a · Cited by 335
Self-citationHigh-sensitivity Analytical Approaches for the Structural Characterization of Glycoproteins
Alley, W. R., Mann, B. F., & Novotny, M. V. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3003714 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- Gestwicki, J. E., Cairo, C. W., Strong, L. E., Oetjen, K. A., & Kiessling, L. L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2002-11-22
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 14922-14933
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2090309798
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.