The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MLCT State Structure and Dynamics of a Copper(I) Diimine Complex Characterized by Pump−Probe X-ray and Laser Spectroscopies and DFT Calculations
Abstract
The molecular structure and dynamics of the photoexcited metal-to-ligand-charge-transfer (MLCT) state of [Cu(I)(dmp)(2)](+), where dmp is 2,9-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline, in acetonitrile have been investigated by time-domain pump-probe X-ray absorption spectroscopy, femtosecond optical transient spectroscopy, and density functional theory (DFT). The time resolution for the excited state structural determination was 100 ps, provided by single X-ray pulses from a third generation synchrotron source. The copper ion in the thermally equilibrated MLCT state has the same oxidation state as the corresponding copper(II) complex in the ground state and was found to be penta-coordinate with an average nearest neighbor Cu-N distance 0.04 A shorter than that of the ground state [Cu(I)(dmp)(2)](+). The results confirm the previously proposed "exciplex" structure of the MLCT state in Lewis basic solvents. The evolution from the photoexcited Franck-Condon MLCT state to the thermally equilibrated MLCT state was followed by femtosecond optical transient spectroscopy, revealing three time constants of 500-700 fs, 10-20 ps, and 1.6-1.7 ns, likely related to the kinetics for the formation of the triplet MLCT state, structural relaxation, and the MLCT excited-state decay to the ground state, respectively. DFT calculations are used to interpret the spectral shift on structural relaxation and to predict the geometries of the ground state, the tetracoordinate excited state, and the exciplex. The DFT calculations also indicate that the amount of charge transferred from copper to the dmp ligand upon photoexcitation is similar to the charge difference at the copper center between the ground-state copper(I) and copper(II) complexes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
te Velde, G., Bickelhaupt, F. M., Baerends, E. J., Fonseca Guerra, C., van Gisbergen, S. J. A., Snijders, J. G., & Ziegler, T. (2001) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.1056 · Cited by 10,152
Application of the energy gap law to nonradiative, excited-state decay
Caspar, J. V., & Meyer, T. J. (1983) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/j100229a010 · Cited by 1,004
Cited by
Ultrafast X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy
Bressler, C., & Chergui, M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr0206667 · Cited by 493
Hsu, C.-W., Lin, C.-C., Chung, M.-W., Chi, Y., Lee, G.-H., Chou, P.-T., Chang, C.-H., & Chen, P.-Y. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja2026568 · Cited by 365
Zhang, Y., Schulz, M., Wächtler, M., Karnahl, M., & Dietzek, B. (2018) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.016 · Cited by 346
Chen, L. X., Zhang, X., Lockard, J. V., Stickrath, A. B., Attenkofer, K., Jennings, G., & Liu, D.-J. (2010) · Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · doi:10.1107/s0108767309051496 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, L. X., Shaw, G. B., Novozhilova, I., Liu, T., Jennings, G., Attenkofer, K., Meyer, G. J., & Coppens, P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-05-17
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 7022-7034
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2104148174
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.