The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mechanism of Asymmetric Hydrogenation of Ketones Catalyzed by BINAP/1,2-Diamine−Ruthenium(II) Complexes
Abstract
Asymmetric hydrogenation of acetophenone with trans-RuH(eta(1)-BH(4))[(S)-tolbinap][(S,S)-dpen] (TolBINAP = 2,2'-bis(di-4-tolylphosphino)-1,1'-binaphthyl; DPEN = 1,2-diphenylethylenediamine) in 2-propanol gives (R)-phenylethanol in 82% ee. The reaction proceeds smoothly even at an atmospheric pressure of H(2) at room temperature and is further accelerated by addition of an alkaline base or a strong organic base. Most importantly, the hydrogenation rate is initially increased to a great extent with an increase in base molarity but subsequently decreases. Without a base, the rate is independent of H(2) pressure in the range of 1-16 atm, while in the presence of a base, the reaction is accelerated with increasing H(2) pressure. The extent of enantioselection is unaffected by hydrogen pressure, the presence or absence of base, the kind of base and coexisting metallic or organic cations, the nature of the solvent, or the substrate concentrations. The reaction with H(2)/(CH(3))(2)CHOH proceeds 50 times faster than that with D(2)/(CD(3))(2)CDOD in the absence of base, but the rate differs only by a factor of 2 in the presence of KO-t-C(4)H(9). These findings indicate that dual mechanisms are in operation, both of which are dependent on reaction conditions and involve heterolytic cleavage of H(2) to form a common reactive intermediate. The key [RuH(diphosphine)(diamine)](+) and its solvate complex have been detected by ESI-TOFMS and NMR spectroscopy. The hydrogenation of ketones is proposed to occur via a nonclassical metal-ligand bifunctional mechanism involving a chiral RuH(2)(diphosphine)(diamine), where a hydride on Ru and a proton of the NH(2) ligand are simultaneously transferred to the C=O function via a six-membered pericyclic transition state. The NH(2) unit in the diamine ligand plays a pivotal role in the catalysis. The reaction occurs in the outer coordination sphere of the 18e RuH(2) complex without C=O/metal interaction. The enantiofaces of prochiral aromatic ketones are kinetically differentiated on the molecular surface of the coordinatively saturated chiral RuH(2) intermediate rather than in a coordinatively unsaturated Ru template.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clapham, S. E., Hadzovic, A., & Morris, R. H. (2004) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2004.04.007 · Cited by 1,316
Noyori, R., Kitamura, M., & Ohkuma, T. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0307928100 · Cited by 277
Self-citationVieira, I. D. S., Whitelaw, E. L., Jones, M. D., & Herres‐Pawlis, S. (2013) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.201203973 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandoval, C. A., Ohkuma, T., Muñiz, K., & Noyori, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-10-11
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 44
- Pages
- 13490-13503
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2019437299
- Cited by
- 628
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.