The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Water-Compatible Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Obtained via High-Throughput Synthesis and Experimental Design
Abstract
A technique allowing high-throughput synthesis and evaluation of molecularly imprinted polymer sorbents at a reduced scale (mini-MIPs) was developed and used for the optimization of MIPs for use in pure aqueous environments. The technique incorporated a 4-port liquid-handling robot for the rapid dispensing of monomers, templates, solvents and initiator into the reaction vessels of a 96-well plate. A library of 80 polymers, each ca. 50 mg, could thus be prepared in 24 h. The MIP rebinding capacity and selectivity could be rapidly assessed in the batch mode by quantifying nonbound fractions in parallel using a UV monochromator plate reader. This allowed a complete evaluation of the binding characteristics of an 80 polymer library in approximately 1 week. With the objective of optimizing a polymer imprinted with the local anaesthetic Bupivacaine for use in pure aqueous systems, a polymer library was prepared by varying the original poly(MAA-co-EDMA) MIP composition. The variable factors were the added amount of the hydrophilic comonomer, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), the cross-linking ratio, and the porogen. This optimization resulted in polymers showing high imprinting factors (IF = K(MIP)/K(NIP)) in water as a result, mainly, of reduced binding to the nonimprinted polymer. Normal scale batches of these materials showed strong retention of the template and low nonspecific binding when assessed as chromatographic stationary phases using pure phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, as mobile phase, by equilibrium batch rebinding experiments and as sorbents for extractions of the analyte from blood plasma samples.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alexander, C., Andersson, H. S., Andersson, L. I., Ansell, R. J., Kirsch, N., Nicholls, I. A., O'Mahony, J., & Whitcombe, M. J. (2006) · Journal of Molecular Recognition · doi:10.1002/jmr.760 · Cited by 1,248
Self-citationMolecular imprinted polymers for separation science: A review of reviews
Cheong, W. J., Yang, S. H., & Ali, F. (2013) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.201200784 · Cited by 507
Solid-phase extraction of organic compounds: A critical review. part ii
Andrade-Eiroa, A., Canle, M., Leroy-Cancellieri, V., & Cerdà, V. (2016) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.08.014 · Cited by 437
From 3D to 2D: A Review of the Molecular Imprinting of Proteins
Turner, N. W., Jeans, C. W., Brain, K. R., Allender, C. J., Hlady, V., & Britt, D. W. (2006) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/bp060122g · Cited by 396
New sorbents for extraction and microextraction techniques
Augusto, F., Carasek, E., Silva, R. G. C., Rivellino, S. R., Batista, A. D., & Martendal, E. (2010) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.12.033 · Cited by 260
Metadata
- Authors
- Dirion, B., Cobb, Z., Schillinger, E., Andersson, L. I., & Sellergren, B.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-12
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 15101-15109
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2008125742
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Water-Compatible Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Obtained via High-Throughput Synthesis and Experimental Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0355473
- The paper
- Dirion, B., Cobb, Z., Schillinger, E., Andersson, L. I., & Sellergren, B. (2003). Water-Compatible Molecularly Imprinted Polymers Obtained via High-Throughput Synthesis and Experimental Design. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0355473
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.