The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Continuous Flow Hydroformylation of Alkenes in Supercritical Fluid−Ionic Liquid Biphasic Systems
Abstract
A process for the hydroformylation of relatively low volatility alkenes (demonstrated for 1-dodecene) in a continuous flow system is described. The catalyst is dissolved in an ionic liquid while the substrate and gaseous reagents are transported into the reactor dissolved in supercritical CO(2), which simultaneously acts as a transport vector for aldehyde products. Decompression of the fluid mixture downstream yields products which are free of both reaction solvent and catalyst. The use of rhodium complexes of triaryl phosphites leads to ligand degradation through reaction of the ionic liquid with water and subsequent attack of the released HF on the phosphite. Sodium salts of sulfonated phosphines are insufficiently soluble in the ionic liquids to obtain acceptable rates, but replacing the sodium by a cation similar to that derived from the ionic liquid, allows good solubility and activity to be obtained. The nature of the ionic liquid is very important in achieving high rates, with 1-alkyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)amides giving the best activity if the alkyl chain is at least C(8). Catalyst turnover frequencies as high as 500 h(-1) have been observed, with the better rates at higher substrate flow rates. Rhodium leaching into the product stream can be as low as 0.012 ppm, except at low partial pressures of CO/H(2), when it is significantly higher. Oxygen impurities in the CO(2) feed can lead to oxidation of the phosphine giving higher rates, lower selectivities to the linear aldehyde, increased alkene isomerization and greater leaching of rhodium. However, it is found that under certain process conditions, the supercritical fluid-ionic liquid (SCF-IL) system can be operated continuously for several weeks without any visible sign of catalyst degradation. Comparisons with commercial hydroformylation processes are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pârvulescu, V. I., & Hardacre, C. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050948h · Cited by 2,377
Use of ionic liquids as ‘green’ solvents for extractions
Zhao, H., Xia, S., & Ma, P. (2005) · Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology · doi:10.1002/jctb.1333 · Cited by 873
Jessop, P. G., & Subramaniam, B. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr040199o · Cited by 561
Efficient acid-catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose in organic electrolyte solutions
Zhang, Z., Liu, B., & Zhao, Z. (. (2012) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.01.010 · Cited by 55
Kornpointner, C., Sainz Martinez, A., Schnürch, M., Halbwirth, H., & Bica-Schröder, K. (2021) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1gc03516a · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Webb, P. B., Sellin, M. F., Kunene, T. E., Williamson, S., Slawin, A. M. Z., & Cole-Hamilton, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2003-11-19
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 15577-15588
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2039310211
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.