The DOI matches its Crossref record.
How Much Backbone Motion in Ubiquitin Is Required To Account for Dipolar Coupling Data Measured in Multiple Alignment Media as Assessed by Independent Cross-Validation?
Abstract
The magnitude of backbone internal motions in the small protein ubiquitin that needs to be invoked to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media is investigated using an intuitively straightforward approach. This involves simultaneous refinement of the coordinates (against NOE, torsion angle, and dipolar coupling restraints) and optimization of the magnitudes and orientations of the alignment tensors by means of torsion angle simulated annealing and Cartesian space minimization. We show that N-H dipolar couplings in 11 different alignment media and N-C', H(N)-C', and C alpha-C' dipolar coupling in two alignment media can be accounted for, at approximately the level of uncertainty in the experimental data, by a single structure representation. Extension to a two-member ensemble representation which provides the simplest description of anisotropic motions in the form of a two-site jump model (in which the overall calculated dipolar couplings are the averages of the calculated dipolar couplings of the individual ensemble members), results in modest, but significant, improvements in dipolar coupling R-factors for both the working set of couplings used in the refinement and for the free cross-validated set of C alpha-H alpha dipolar couplings recorded in two alignment media. Extensions to larger ensemble sizes do not result in any R-factor improvement for the cross-validated C alpha-H alpha dipolar couplings. With a few notable exceptions, the amplitudes of the anisotropic motions are small, with S(2)(jump) order parameters > or =0.8. Moreover, the structural impact of those few residues that do exhibit larger amplitude motions (S(2)(jump) ranging from 0.3 to 0.8) is minimal and can readily be accommodated by very small backbone atomic rms shifts (<0.5 A) because of compensatory changes in phi and psi backbone torsion angles. In addition, evidence for correlated motions of N-H bond vectors is observed. For most practical applications, however, refinement of NMR structures against dipolar couplings using a single structure representation is adequate and will not adversely impact coordinate accuracy within the limits of the NMR method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Clore, G. M., & Iwahara, J. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900033p · Cited by 782
Self-citationRelation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins
Best, R. B., Lindorff-Larsen, K., DePristo, M. A., & Vendruscolo, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0511156103 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Clore, G. M., & Schwieters, C. D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-02-12
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2923-2938
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1987074852
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Much Backbone Motion in Ubiquitin Is Required To Account for Dipolar Coupling Data Measured in Multiple Alignment Media as Assessed by Independent Cross-Validation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0386804
- The paper
- Clore, G. M., & Schwieters, C. D. (2004). How Much Backbone Motion in Ubiquitin Is Required To Account for Dipolar Coupling Data Measured in Multiple Alignment Media as Assessed by Independent Cross-Validation? Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0386804
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.