The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Role of Solvent in Determining Conformational Preferences of Alanine Dipeptide in Water
Abstract
Evidence from a variety of spectroscopic probes indicates that (phi, psi) values corresponding to the left-handed polyproline II helix (P(II)) are preferred for short alanine-based peptides in water. On the basis of results from theoretical studies, it is believed that the observed preference is dictated by favorable peptide-solvent interactions, which are realized through formation of optimal hydrogen-bonding water bridges between peptide donor and acceptor groups. In the present study, we address this issue explicitly by analyzing the hydration structure and thermodynamics of 16 low-energy conformers of the alanine dipeptide (N-acetylalanine-N'-methylamide) in liquid water. Monte Carlo simulations in the canonical ensemble were performed under ambient conditions with all-atom OPLS parameters for the alanine dipeptide and the TIP5P model for water. We find that the number of hydrogen-bonded water molecules connecting the peptide group donor and acceptor atoms has no effect on the solvation thermodynamics. Instead, the latter are determined by the work done to fully hydrate the peptide. This work is minimal for conformations that are characterized by a minimal overlap of the primary hydration shells around the peptide donor and acceptor atoms. As a result, peptide-solvent interactions favor "compact" conformations that do not include P(II)-like geometries. Our main conclusion is that the experimentally observed preference for P(II) does not arise due to favorable direct interactions between the peptide and water molecules. Instead, the latter act to unmask underlying conformational preferences that are a consequence of minimizing intrapeptide steric conflicts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163
Coherent Two-Dimensional Optical Spectroscopy
Cho, M. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr078377b · Cited by 835
Wagoner, J. A., & Baker, N. A. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600118103 · Cited by 310
Chatbot-assisted quantum chemistry for explicitly solvated molecules
(2025) · doi:10.1039/d4sc08677e · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Drozdov, A. N., Grossfield, A., & Pappu, R. V.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2004-02-04
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2574-2581
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1983684289
- Cited by
- 164
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Role of Solvent in Determining Conformational Preferences of Alanine Dipeptide in Water. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja039051x
- The paper
- Drozdov, A. N., Grossfield, A., & Pappu, R. V. (2004). Role of Solvent in Determining Conformational Preferences of Alanine Dipeptide in Water. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja039051x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.