The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ruthenium(II)-Catalyzed Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Formic Acid. Theoretical Study of Real Catalyst, Ligand Effects, and Solvation Effects
Abstract
Ruthenium-catalyzed hydrogenation of carbon dioxide to formic acid was theoretically investigated with DFT and MP4(SDQ) methods, where a real catalyst, cis-Ru(H)2(PMe3)3, was employed in calculations and compared with a model catalyst, cis-Ru(H)2(PH3)3. Significant differences between the real and model systems are observed in CO2 insertion into the Ru(II)-H bond, isomerization of a ruthenium(II) eta1-formate intermediate, and metathesis of the eta1-formate intermediate with a dihydrogen molecule. All these reactions more easily occur in the real system than in the model system. The differences are interpreted in terms that PMe3 is more donating than PH3 and the trans-influence of PMe3 is stronger than that of PH3. The rate-determining step is the CO2 insertion into the Ru(II)-H bond. Its deltaG(o++) value is 16.8 (6.8) kcal/mol, where the value without parentheses is calculated with the MP4(SDQ) method and that in parentheses is calculated with the DFT method. Because this insertion is considerably endothermic, the coordination of the dihydrogen molecule with the ruthenium(II)-eta1-formate intermediate must necessarily occur to suppress the deinsertion. This means that the reaction rate increases with increase in the pressure of dihydrogen molecule, which is consistent with the experimental results. Solvent effects were investigated with the DPCM method. The activation barrier and reaction energy of the CO2 insertion reaction moderately decrease in the order gas phase > n-heptane > THF, while the activation barrier of the metathesis considerably increases in the order gas phase < n-heptane < THF. Thus, a polar solvent should be used because the insertion reaction is the rate-determining step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Cited by
Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide
Wang, W., Wang, S., Ma, X., & Gong, J. (2011) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c1cs15008a · Cited by 3,316
Single-Atom Catalysis toward Efficient CO2 Conversion to CO and Formate Products
Su, X., Yang, X.-F., Huang, Y., Liu, B., & Zhang, T. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00478 · Cited by 499
Himeda, Y., Onozawa-Komatsuzaki, N., Sugihara, H., & Kasuga, K. (2007) · Organometallics · doi:10.1021/om060899e · Cited by 313
Green catalytic process for cyclic carbonate synthesis from carbon dioxide under mild conditions
Lang, X.-D., & He, L.-N. (2016) · The Chemical Record · doi:10.1002/tcr.201500293 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Ohnishi, Y.-Y., Matsunaga, T., Nakao, Y., Sato, H., & Sakaki, S.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-02-23
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 4021-4032
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2036608037
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.