Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 241

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Switching the Redox Mechanism: Models for Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer from Tyrosine and Tryptophan

Sjödin, Martin, Styring, Stenbjörn, Wolpher, Henriette, Xu, Yunhua, Sun, Licheng, Hammarström, Leif·2005·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The coupling of electron and proton transfer is an important controlling factor in radical proteins, such as photosystem II, ribinucleotide reductase, cytochrome oxidases, and DNA photolyase. This was investigated in model complexes in which a tyrosine or tryptophan residue was oxidized by a laser-flash generated trisbipyridine-Ru(III) moiety in an intramolecular, proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reaction. The PCET was found to proceed in a competition between a stepwise reaction, in which electron transfer is followed by deprotonation of the amino acid radical (ETPT), and a concerted reaction, in which both the electron and proton are transferred in a single reaction step (CEP). Moreover, we found that we could analyze the kinetic data for PCET by Marcus' theory for electron transfer. By altering the solution pH, the strength of the Ru(III) oxidant, or the identity of the amino acid, we could induce a switch between the two mechanisms and obtain quantitative data for the parameters that control which one will dominate. The characteristic pH-dependence of the CEP rate (M. Sjodin et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3932) reflects the pH-dependence of the driving force caused by proton release to the bulk. For the pH-independent ETPT on the other hand, the driving force of the rate-determining ET step is pH-independent and smaller. On the other hand, temperature-dependent data showed that the reorganization energy was higher for CEP, while the pre-exponential factors showed no significant difference between the mechanisms. Thus, the opposing effect of the differences in driving force and reorganization energy determines which of the mechanisms will dominate. Our results show that a concerted mechanism is in general quite likely and provides a low-barrier reaction pathway for weakly exoergonic reactions. In addition, the kinetic isotope effect was much higher for CEP (kH/kD > 10) than for ETPT (kH/kD = 2), consistent with significant changes along the proton reaction coordinate in the rate-determining step of CEP.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja044395o

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 241

Metadata

Authors
Sjödin, M., Styring, S., Wolpher, H., Xu, Y., Sun, L., & Hammarström, L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2005-02-25
Volume
127
Issue
11
Pages
3855-3863
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2094784806
Cited by
241
References
1
FWCI
14.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.