NMR Reveals Anomalous Copper(II) Binding to the Amyloid Aβ Peptide of Alzheimer's Disease
Abstract
The Abeta peptide is the major protein component of amyloid deposits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Age-related microenvironmental changes in the AD brain promote amyloid formation that leads to cell injury and death. Altered levels of metals (such as Cu and Zn) exist in the AD brain, and because Cu and Zn can be bound to the Abeta in the amyloid plaques, it is thought that these binding events in vivo may trigger or prevent Abeta amyloid formation in the AD brain. Although several structural models have been proposed, all of these are undefined due to the lack of definitive structural data. The present NMR studies utilized uniformly 15N-labeled Abeta(1-40) peptide and 1H-15N HSQC experiments and demonstrate for the first time that the Abeta binds Cu and Zn in a distinct manner. The binding promotes NH signal disappearance of E3-V18, which was not due to the paramagnetic effect of Cu2+, as identical NMR studies were seen with Zn2+, which is diamagnetic. NMR titration experiments showed that the amide NH peak intensities of R5-L17 showed the most pronounced intensity reduction, and that the 1H signals for the side chain aromatic signals of the three histidines shift upfield (H6, H13, and H14). We propose that initially Cu2+ is anchored to the Abeta monomer (fast exchange rate) and is followed by deprotonation and/or severe line broadening of the backbone amide NH for E3-V18 (intermediate exchange rate). By contrast, Cu2+ binding to soluble Abeta aggregates leads to rapid aggrega…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pM values compare favorably with Kd values reported for Cu-Aβ (nM-μM) and Zn-Aβ (μM).
“These pM values represent approximate dissociation constants and compare favorably with the Kd values reported for Cu-Aβ (nM-μM) and Zn-Aβ (μM).26,29,31,57,76,79,80”
From Bifunctional Compounds for Controlling Metal-Mediated Aggregation of the Aβ<sub>42</sub>Peptide (2012) · cites this paper as [80]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 169
- Authors
- Hou, L., & Zagorski, M. G.
- Affiliations
- Case Western Reserve University (US)
- ORCID
- Hou, Liming
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-06-28
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 9260-9261
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2070090190
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 9.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag014363-08)
- National Institute on Aging (AG-14363)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS042852, NS-42852)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Trace Elements in Health
- Keywords
- amyloid-beta, Aβ(1-40), copper(II) binding, zinc binding, Alzheimer's disease, metal ion binding, metal-induced aggregation, beta-sheet, paramagnetic effects, metal sequestration, neuroprotection, oxygen free radicals
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Copper, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protein Binding, Zinc, Amyloid beta-Peptides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review