The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conservation of μs−ms Enzyme Motions in the Apo- and Substrate-Mimicked State
Abstract
Solution NMR spin-relaxation experiments were used to compare mus-ms dynamics in RNase A in the apo form and as complexed to the substrate-mimic, pTppAp. The crystal structure of the RNase A/pTppAp complex was determined and demonstrates that this ligand binds at the active site and utilizes established substrate binding sites in its interaction with RNase A. Relaxation-compensated CPMG experiments identify flexible residues in and around the active site in both the apo and pTppAp-bound enzyme. Quantitative analysis of the NMR spin-relaxation dispersion curves show that the time scale of motion in RNase A is unchanged when pTppAp binds and is similar to the time scale for the rate-determining step of the catalytic reaction. Temperature-dependent measurements provide an activation barrier for motion of 5.2 +/- 1.0 kcal/mol and 4.5 +/- 1.2 kcal/mol for the apo and pTppAp forms of RNase A, respectively. These data indicate very similar motion exists in the free and bound enzyme. Additionally, chemical shift data suggests that the magnitude of motion is also similar for these two forms and that it is likely that apo enzyme interconverts to a structure that resembles a ligand-bound form. Likewise, it appears that the bound conformation samples the apo enzyme form even when ligand is present. Taken together the data imply that RNase A is in a preexisting dynamic equilibrium between two conformations that represent the open and closed enzyme forms. These data suggest that ligand binding stabilizes the bound conformer but does not induce it.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters
Marquardt, D. W. (1963) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0111030 · Cited by 30,728
Cited by
The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition
Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R., & Wright, P. E. (2009) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.232 · Cited by 2,008
An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics
Kleckner, I. R., & Foster, M. P. (2011) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.10.012 · Cited by 561
An NMR Perspective on Enzyme Dynamics
Boehr, D. D., Dyson, H. J., & Wright, P. E. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050312q · Cited by 458
Catalytic Contributions from Remote Regions of Enzyme Structure
Lee, J., & Goodey, N. M. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100042n · Cited by 116
Di Cera, E. (2020) · Biophysics Reviews · doi:10.1063/5.0020997 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Beach, H., Cole, R., Gill, M. L., & Loria, J. P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 9167-9176
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1980397617
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conservation of μs−ms Enzyme Motions in the Apo- and Substrate-Mimicked State. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0514949
- The paper
- Beach, H., Cole, R., Gill, M. L., & Loria, J. P. (2005). Conservation of μs−ms Enzyme Motions in the Apo- and Substrate-Mimicked State. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0514949
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.