The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Excited-State Potential Energy Surface for the Photophysics of Adenine
Abstract
The decay paths on the singlet excited-state surface of 9H-adenine and the associated energy barriers have been calculated at the CAS-PT2//CASSCF level. There are three fundamental paths for the photophysics: two paths for the (1)L(b) state which are virtually barrierless at the present level of theory and correspond to formation of the (n,pi) intermediate and direct decay to the ground state and a third path for ground-state decay of the (n,pi) state with an activation barrier of approximately 0.1 eV. The (1)L(a) state, which has the largest oscillator strength, either decays directly to the ground state or contributes indirectly to the excited-state lifetime by populating the two other states. The results are used to interpret the photophysics in terms of an excited-state plateau for the (1)L(b) state that corresponds to the short-lived excited-state component (approximately 0.1 ps) and a well (i.e., a proper minimum) for the (n,pi) state that gives rise to the long component (1 ps or more). The direct decay to the ground state of the (1)L(b) state is probably the decay channel invoked to explain the experimental wavelength dependence of the relative amplitudes of the two components. In addition to that, the excited-state component in the nanosecond range detected in the time-resolved photoelectron spectrum is proposed to be a triplet (pi,pi) state formed after intersystem crossing from the singlet (n,pi) state.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Triplet State and Molecular Electronic Processes in Organic Molecules
Lower, S. K., & El-Sayed, M. A. (1966) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60240a004 · Cited by 1,146
Cited by
Improta, R., Santoro, F., & Blancafort, L. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00444 · Cited by 499
Self-citationAre the five natural DNA/RNA base monomers a good choice from natural selection?
Serrano-Andrés, L., & Merchán, M. (2009) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2008.12.001 · Cited by 305
Unified Model for the Ultrafast Decay of Pyrimidine Nucleobases
Merchán, M., González-Luque, R., Climent, T., Serrano-Andrés, L., Rodríguez, E., Reguero, M., & Peláez, D. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp066874a · Cited by 263
Molecular Basis of DNA Photodimerization: Intrinsic Production of Cyclobutane Cytosine Dimers
Roca-Sanjuán, D., Olaso-González, G., González-Ramírez, I., Serrano-Andrés, L., & Merchán, M. (2008) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja803068n · Cited by 115
Sauri, V., Gobbo, J. P., Serrano-Pérez, J. J., Lundberg, M., Coto, P. B., Serrano-Andrés, L., Borin, A. C., Lindh, R., Merchán, M., & Roca-Sanjuán, D. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct3006166 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Blancafort, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-12-14
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 210-219
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2146234190
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.