The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical Investigations on Chalcogen−Chalcogen Interactions: What Makes These Nonbonded Interactions Bonding?
Abstract
To understand the intermolecular interactions between chalcogen centers (O, S, Se, Te), quantum chemical calculations on pairs of model systems were carried out. For the oxygen derivatives, one of the components of the supermolecules consists of dimethyl ether, while the second component is either dimethyl ether (1) or ethynyl methyl ether (2) or methyl cyanate (3). The model calculations were also extended to the sulfur (4-6), selenium (7-9), and tellurium congeners (10-12). The MP2/SDB-cc-pVTZ, 6-311G level of theory was used to derive the geometrical parameters and the global energies of the model systems. A detailed analysis based on symmetry adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) reveals that induction and dispersion forces contribute to the bonding in each case. For 1-3 the electrostatic energy also contributes to the intermolecular bonding, but not for 4-12. The NBO analysis reveals that the interaction in the dimers 1-3 is mainly due to weak hydrogen bonding between methyl groups and chalcogen centers. Similar hydrogen bonding is also found in the case of 4 and to a lesser extent in 5 and 7. For the aggregates with heavier centers the chalcogen-chalcogen interaction dominates, and hydrogen bonding only plays a minor role. Electron-withdrawing groups on the chalcogen centers increase the interaction energy and reduce the intermolecular distance dramatically. The one-electron picture of an interaction between the lone pair of the donor and the chalcogen carbon sigma orbital allows a qualitatively correct reproduction of the observed trend.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems
Møller, C., & Plesset, M. S. (1934) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.46.618 · Cited by 14,614
Supramolecular Chemistry: Concepts and Perspectives
Lehn, J. (1995) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/3527607439 · Cited by 9,864
Contracted Gaussian basis sets for molecular calculations. I. Second row atoms, Z=11–18
McLean, A. D., & Chandler, G. S. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438980 · Cited by 9,798
Results obtained with the correlation energy density functionals of becke and Lee, Yang and Parr
Miehlich, B., Savin, A., Stoll, H., & Preuss, H. (1989) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/0009-2614(89)87234-3 · Cited by 7,295
The Structure of the Potassium Channel: Molecular Basis of K + Conduction and Selectivity
Doyle, D. A., Cabral, J. M., Pfuetzner, R. A., Kuo, A., Gulbis, J. M., Cohen, S. L., Chait, B. T., & MacKinnon, R. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5360.69 · Cited by 6,807
A full coupled-cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples
Purvis, G. D., & Bartlett, R. J. (1982) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.443164 · Cited by 6,466
Foster, J. P., & Weinhold, F. (1980) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00544a007 · Cited by 4,975
Pople, J. A., Head-Gordon, M., & Raghavachari, K. (1987) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.453520 · Cited by 4,535
Ab initio energy-adjusted pseudopotentials for elements of groups 13–17
Bergner, A., Dolg, M., Küchle, W., Stoll, H., & Preuß, H. (1993) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268979300103121 · Cited by 2,889
Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry
Horn, A., & Lanig, H. (1999) · Journal of Molecular Modeling · doi:10.1007/s0089490050141 · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Chalcogen bonding in synthesis, catalysis and design of materials
Mahmudov, K. T., Kopylovich, M. N., Guedes da Silva, M. F. C., & Pombeiro, A. J. L. (2017) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c7dt01685a · Cited by 466
Anion Recognition Strategies Based on Combined Noncovalent Interactions
Molina, P., Zapata, F., & Caballero, A. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00814 · Cited by 406
Gleiter, R., Haberhauer, G., Werz, D. B., Rominger, F., & Bleiholder, C. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00449 · Cited by 348
Self-citationChudzinski, M. G., McClary, C. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2011) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja202096f · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Bleiholder, C., Werz, D. B., Köppel, H., & Gleiter, R.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-02-03
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2666-2674
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1981753260
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 13.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Investigations on Chalcogen−Chalcogen Interactions: What Makes These Nonbonded Interactions Bonding? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja056827g
- The paper
- Bleiholder, C., Werz, D. B., Köppel, H., & Gleiter, R. (2006). Theoretical Investigations on Chalcogen−Chalcogen Interactions: What Makes These Nonbonded Interactions Bonding? Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja056827g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.