The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insights into the Mechanism and Catalysis of the Native Chemical Ligation Reaction
Abstract
Native chemical ligation of unprotected peptide segments involves reaction between a peptide-alpha-thioester and a cysteine-peptide, to yield a product with a native amide bond at the ligation site. Peptide-alpha-thioalkyl esters are commonly used because of their ease of preparation. These thioalkyl esters are rather unreactive so the ligation reaction is catalyzed by in situ transthioesterification with thiol additives. The most common thiol catalysts used to date have been either a mixture of thiophenol/benzyl mercaptan, or the alkanethiol MESNA. Despite the use of these thiol catalysts, ligation reactions typically take 24-48 h. To gain insight into the mechanism of native chemical ligaton and in order to find a better catalyst, we investigated the use of a number of thiol compounds. Substituted thiophenols with pK(a) > 6 were found to best combine the ability to exchange rapidly and completely with thioalkyl esters, and to then act as effective leaving groups in reaction of the peptide-thioester with the thiol side chain of a cysteine-peptide. A highly effective and practical catalyst was (4-carboxylmethyl)thiophenol ('MPAA'), a nonmalodorous, water-soluble thiol. Use of MPAA gave an order of magnitude faster reaction in model studies of native chemical ligation and in the synthesis of a small protein, turkey ovomucoid third domain (OMTKY3). MPAA should find broad use in native chemical ligation and in the total synthesis of proteins.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Advances in Fmoc solid‐phase peptide synthesis
Behrendt, R., White, P., & Offer, J. (2016) · Journal of Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/psc.2836 · Cited by 760
Native Chemical Ligation and Extended Methods: Mechanisms, Catalysis, Scope, and Limitations
Agouridas, V., El Mahdi, O., Diemer, V., Cargoët, M., Monbaliu, J.-C. M., & Melnyk, O. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00712 · Cited by 650
Rapid Oxime and Hydrazone Ligations with Aromatic Aldehydes for Biomolecular Labeling
Dirksen, A., & Dawson, P. E. (2008) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/bc800310p · Cited by 373
Expanding the chemical toolbox for the synthesis of large and uniquely modified proteins
Bondalapati, S., Jbara, M., & Brik, A. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2476 · Cited by 359
Arl2-GTP and Arl3-GTP regulate a GDI-like transport system for farnesylated cargo
Ismail, S. A., Chen, Y.-X., Rusinova, A., Chandra, A., Bierbaum, M., Gremer, L., Triola, G., Waldmann, H., Bastiaens, P. I. H., & Wittinghofer, A. (2011) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.686 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Johnson, E. C. B., & Kent, S. B. H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-04-29
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 6640-6646
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1971923734
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insights into the Mechanism and Catalysis of the Native Chemical Ligation Reaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja058344i
- The paper
- Johnson, E. C. B., & Kent, S. B. H. (2006). Insights into the Mechanism and Catalysis of the Native Chemical Ligation Reaction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja058344i
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.