Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Enantioselective Synthesis of Axially Chiral Anilides through Rhodium-Catalyzed [2+2+2] Cycloaddition of 1,6-Diynes with Trimethylsilylynamides

Tanaka, Ken, Takeishi, Kenzo, Noguchi, Keiichi·2006·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

We have developed a rhodium-catalyzed enantioselective intermolecular [2+2+2] cycloaddition of 1,6-diynes with trimethylsilylynamides for the synthesis of axially chiral anilides. The axial chirality is constructed at the formation of benzene rings with high enantioselectivity (up to 98% ee). It should be noted that the present reaction employs the readily prepared trimethylsilylynamides starting from commercially available bis(trimethysilyl)acetylene and the trimethylsilyl group of the product anilides is expected to be utilized for further functionalization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja060348f

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Tanaka, K., Takeishi, K., & Noguchi, K.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2006-03-21
Volume
128
Issue
14
Pages
4586-4587
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2163377997
Cited by
247
References
0
FWCI
10.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.