The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Popular Theoretical Methods Predict Benzene and Arenes To Be Nonplanar
Abstract
Planar (D6h) benzene has one (1181i cm-1, b2g) and three (1844i cm-1, b2g; 462i cm-1, e2u) imaginary vibrational frequencies at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) and MP2/6-311++G levels of theory, respectively! The spurious frequencies correspond to D3d chair (b2g) and C2v boat (e2u) out-of-plane distortions. Numerous, similar examples where planar benzene is not a minimum are documented at the MP2, MP3, and CISD levels with popular Pople-type basis sets, while the RHF, B3LYP, and BLYP methods exhibit no such problems. We show that, in the sp and spd atomic-orbital limits of MP2 theory, benzene is nonplanar. The observed failure of electron correlation methods with unbalanced basis sets to predict planar minima is not unique to benzene but is also found for other pi-delocalized molecules, including pyridine, naphthalene, anthracene, the cyclopentadienyl and indenyl anions, and the tropylium cation. Detailed mathematical analysis reveals that an insidious, geometry-dependent, two-electron basis set incompleteness error (BSIE) is responsible for the problem and that balanced, correlation-consistent constructions of basis sets are generally required to ensure reliable predictions for arenes with correlated wave functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lodewyk, M. W., Siebert, M. R., & Tantillo, D. J. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200106v · Cited by 1,287
Kruse, H., & Grimme, S. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3700154 · Cited by 890
Best‐Practice DFT Protocols for Basic Molecular Computational Chemistry**
Bursch, M., Mewes, J., Hansen, A., & Grimme, S. (2022) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202205735 · Cited by 890
Combining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
How to Compute Isomerization Energies of Organic Molecules with Quantum Chemical Methods
Grimme, S., Steinmetz, M., & Korth, M. (2007) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo062446p · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Moran, D., Simmonett, A. C., Leach, F. E., Allen, W. D., Schleyer, P. V. R., & Schaefer, H. F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2006-06-29
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 9342-9343
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2078655208
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Popular Theoretical Methods Predict Benzene and Arenes To Be Nonplanar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja0630285
- The paper
- Moran, D., Simmonett, A. C., Leach, F. E., Allen, W. D., Schleyer, P. V. R., & Schaefer, H. F. (2006). Popular Theoretical Methods Predict Benzene and Arenes To Be Nonplanar. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0630285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.