Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Poly(vinylpyrrolidone)-Modified Graphite Carbon Nanofibers as Promising Supports for PtRu Catalysts in Direct Methanol Fuel Cells

Hsin, Yu Lin, Hwang, Kuo Chu, Yeh, Chuin-Tih·2007·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Carbon nanomaterials, including herringbone graphite carbon nanofibers (GNFH), multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), and carbon black, were surface-modified by a new poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) grafting process as well as by the conventional acid-oxidation (AO) process, and characterized by FTIR, TGA, Raman, HRTEM, XRD, and XPS measurements. Pt nanoparticles of 1.8 nm were evenly deposited on all PVP-grafted carbon nanomaterials. The effects of the two surface modification processes on the dispersion, average Pt nanoparticle sizes, the electrocatalytic performance, and electrical conductivities of Pt-carbon nanocomposites in direct methanol oxidation were systematically studied and compared. It was found that the PVP-grafted carbon nanomaterials have much less loss in the electric conductivity and thus better electrocatalytic performance, 17-463% higher, than their corresponding acid oxidation-treated nanocomposites. The electrocatalytic performance of the Pt-carbon nanocomposites decreases in the following order: Pt-PVP-GNFH > Pt-PVP-MWCNTarc > Pt-AO-MWCNTarc > Pt-PVP-MWCNTCVD > Pt-AO-MWCNTCVD > Pt-XC-72R > Pt-AO-GNFH, with the Pt-PVP-GNFH nanocomposite having approximately 270% higher performance than that of the Pt-Vulcan XC-72R nanocomposite. In addition, PtRu-PVP-GNFH shows even better (50% higher) electrocatalytic activity than the Pt-PVP-GNFH nanocomposite at a 0.6 V applied voltage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja072367a

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hsin, Y. L., Hwang, K. C., & Yeh, C.-T.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2007-07-21
Volume
129
Issue
32
Pages
9999-10010
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W1991803078
Cited by
467
References
0
FWCI
17.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.