The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer of Tyrosine Oxidation: Buffer Dependence and Parallel Mechanisms
Abstract
The proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) from tyrosine covalently linked to a metal complex has been studied. The reaction was induced by laser flash excitation of the metal complex, and PCET was bidirectional, with electron transfer to the excited or flash-quenched oxidized metal complex and proton transfer to water or added buffers in the solution. We found a competition between three different PCET mechanisms: (1) A concerted PCET with water as the proton acceptor, which indeed shows a pH-dependence as earlier reported (Sjödin, M.; Styring, S.; Åkermark, B.; Sun, L.; Hammarström, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3932); (2) a stepwise electron transfer−proton transfer (ETPT) that is pH-independent; (3) a buffer-assisted concerted PCET. The relative importance of reaction 2 increases with oxidant strength, while that of reaction 1 increases with pH. At higher buffer concentrations reaction 3 becomes important, and the rate follows the expected first-order dependence on the concentration of the buffer base. Most importantly, the pH-dependence of reaction 1, with a slope of 0.4−0.5 in a plot of log k vs pH, is independent of buffer and cannot be explained by reaction schemes with simple first-order dependencies on [OH - ], [H 3 O + ], or buffer species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reece, S. Y., Hodgkiss, J. M., Stubbe, J., & Nocera, D. G. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1874 · Cited by 294
Self-citation
Cited by
Theory of Coupled Electron and Proton Transfer Reactions
Hammes-Schiffer, S., & Stuchebrukhov, A. A. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr1001436 · Cited by 848
Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer: Moving Together and Charging Forward
Hammes-Schiffer, S. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.5b04087 · Cited by 468
Chemistry of Personalized Solar Energy
Nocera, D. G. (2009) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic901328v · Cited by 395
Self-citationOxidation of DNA: Damage to Nucleobases
Kanvah, S., Joseph, J., Schuster, G. B., Barnett, R. N., Cleveland, C. L., & Landman, U. (2010) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar900175a · Cited by 338
Recent advances in electrocatalysts for seawater splitting
Liu, G., Xu, Y., Yang, T., & Jiang, L. (2023) · Nano Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.nanoms.2020.12.003 · Cited by 322
Metadata
- Authors
- Irebo, T., Reece, S. Y., Sjödin, M., Nocera, D. G., & Hammarström, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-21
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 50
- Pages
- 15462-15464
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2067506815
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.