The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry of Uniform and Mixed Monolayer Nanoparticles: Au25[S(CH2)2Ph]18 and Au25[S(CH2)2Ph]18-x(SR)x
Abstract
New approaches to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS)-with exact compositional assignments-of small (Au25) nanoparticles with uniform and mixed protecting organothiolate monolayers are described. The results expand the scope of analysis and reveal a rich chemistry of ionization behavior. ESI-MS of solutions of phenylethanethiolate monolayer-protected gold clusters (MPCs), Au25(SC2Ph)18, containing alkali metal acetate salts (MOAc) produce spectra in which, for Na+, K+, Rb+, and Cs+ acetates, the dominant species are MAu25(SC2Ph)182+ and M2Au25(SC2Ph)182+. Li+ acetates caused ligand loss. This method was extended to the analysis of Au25 MPCs with mixed monolayers, where thiophenolate (-SPh), hexanethiolate (-SC6), or biotinylated (-S-PEG-biotin) ligands had been introduced by ligand exchange. In negative-mode ESI-MS, no added reagents were needed in order to observe Au25(SC2Ph)18- and to analyze mixed monolayer Au25 MPCs prepared by ligand exchange with 4-mercaptobenzoic acid, HSPhCOOH, which gave spectra through deprotonation of the carboxylic acids. Adducts of tetraoctylammonium (Oct4N+) with -SPhCOO- sites were also observed. Mass spectrometry is the only method that has demonstrated capacity for measuring the exact distribution of ligand-exchange products. The possible origins of the different Au25 core charges (1-, 0, 1+, 2+) observed during electrospray ionization are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures.
Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. (1964) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac60214a047 · Cited by 21,904
Cited by
Sub-nanometre sized metal clusters: from synthetic challenges to the unique property discoveries
Lu, Y., & Chen, W. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs15325d · Cited by 1,152
The Story of a Monodisperse Gold Nanoparticle: Au25L18
Parker, J. F., Fields-Zinna, C. A., & Murray, R. W. (2010) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar100048c · Cited by 503
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tracy, J. B., Crowe, M. C., Parker, J. F., Hampe, O., Fields-Zinna, C. A., Dass, A., & Murray, R. W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2007-11-23
- Volume
- 129
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 16209-16215
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2330084754
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.