The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanism and Tafel Lines of Electro-Oxidation of Water to Oxygen on RuO2(110)
Abstract
How to efficiently oxidize H(2)O to O(2) (H(2)O → 1/2O(2) + 2H(+) + 2e(-)) is a great challenge for electrochemical/photo water splitting owing to the high overpotential and catalyst corrosion. Here extensive periodic first-principles calculations integrated with modified-Poisson-Boltzmann electrostatics are utilized to reveal the physical origin of the high overpotential of the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction (OER) on RuO(2)(110). By determining the surface phase diagram, exploring the possible reaction channels, and computing the Tafel lines, we are able to elucidate some long-standing puzzles on the OER kinetics from the atomic level. We show that OER occurs directly on an O-terminated surface phase above 1.58 V vs NHE, but indirectly on a OH/O mixed phase below 1.58 V by converting first the OH/O mixed phase to the O-terminated phase locally. The rate-determining step of OER involves an unusual water oxidation reaction following a Eley-Rideal-like mechanism, where a water molecule from solution breaks its OH bond over surface Os with concurrent new O-OH bond formation. The free energy barrier is 0.74 eV at 1.58 V, and it decreases linearly with the increase of potential above 1.58 V (a slope of 0.56). In contrast, the traditionally regarded surface oxygen coupling reaction with a Langmuir-Hinshelwood mechanism is energetically less favored and its barrier is weakly affected by the potential. Fundamentally, we show that the empirical linear barrier~potential relation is caused by the linear structural response of the solvated transition state to the change of potential. Finally, the general strategy for finding better OER anode is also presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
(2014) · doi:10.1201/b17118 · Cited by 57,706
Cited by
Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design
Seh, Z. W., Kibsgaard, J., Dickens, C. F., Chorkendorff, I., Nørskov, J. K., & Jaramillo, T. F. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4998 · Cited by 12,114
Homogeneously dispersed multimetal oxygen-evolving catalysts
Zhang, B., Zheng, X., Voznyy, O., Comin, R., Bajdich, M., García-Melchor, M., Han, L., Xu, J., Liu, M., Zheng, L., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaf1525 · Cited by 2,447
Bao, J., Zhang, X., Fan, B., Zhang, J., Zhou, M., Yang, W., Hu, X., Wang, H., Pan, B., & Xie, Y. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201502226 · Cited by 1,428
Electrocatalysis for CO 2 conversion: from fundamentals to value-added products
Wang, G., Chen, J., Ding, Y., Cai, P., Yi, L., Li, Y., Tu, C., Hou, Y., Wen, Z., & Dai, L. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00071j · Cited by 1,295
Reier, T., Nong, H. N., Teschner, D., Schlögl, R., & Strasser, P. (2017) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201601275 · Cited by 1,253
Metadata
- Authors
- Fang, Y.-H., & Liu, Z.-P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-12-06
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 51
- Pages
- 18214-18222
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1982677496
- Cited by
- 598
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.