Cited by 389Graphene research and applicationsGraphene and Nanomaterials ApplicationsCarbon Nanotubes in Composites

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Graphene Oxide Nanocolloids

Abstract

Graphene oxide (GO) nanocolloids-sheets with lateral dimension smaller than 100 nm-were synthesized by chemical exfoliation of graphite nanofibers, in which the graphene planes are coin-stacked along the length of the nanofibers. Since the upper size limit is predetermined by the diameter of the nanofiber precursor, the size distribution of the GO nanosheets is much more uniform than that of common GO synthesized from graphite powders. The size can be further tuned by the oxidation time. Compared to the micrometer-sized, regular GO sheets, nano GO has very similar spectroscopic characteristics and chemical properties but very different solution properties, such as surface activity and colloidal stability. Due to higher charge density originating from their higher edge-to-area ratios, aqueous GO nanocolloids are significantly more stable. Dispersions of GO nanocolloids can sustain high-speed centrifugation and remain stable even after chemical reduction, which would result in aggregates for regular GO. Therefore, nano GO can act as a better dispersing agent for insoluble materials (e.g., carbon nanotubes) in water, creating a more stable colloidal dispersion.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja1078943

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Brodie B. C., 1859, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 149, 249, 10.1098/rstl.1859.0013 · DOI
  2. Hummers W. S., 1958, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 80, 1339, 10.1021/ja01539a017 · DOI
  3. Li D., 2008, Science, 320, 1170, 10.1126/science.1158180 · DOI
  4. Park S., 2009, Nature Nanotechnol., 4, 217, 10.1038/nnano.2009.58 · DOI
  5. Lerf A., 1998, J. Phys. Chem. B, 102, 4477, 10.1021/jp9731821 · DOI
  6. Erickson K., 2010, Adv. Mater., 22, 4467, 10.1002/adma.201000732 · DOI
  7. Allen M. J., 2009, Chem. Rev., 110, 132, 10.1021/cr900070d · DOI
  8. Compton O. C., 2010, Small, 6, 711, 10.1002/smll.200901934 · DOI
  9. Zhang L., 2009, Carbon, 47, 3365, 10.1016/j.carbon.2009.07.045 · DOI
  10. Luo Z. T., 2009, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 898, 10.1021/ja807934n · DOI
  11. Son Y. W., 2006, Nature, 444, 347, 10.1038/nature05180 · DOI
  12. Kosynkin D. V., 2009, Nature, 458, 872, 10.1038/nature07872 · DOI
  13. Cai J. M., 2010, Nature, 466, 470, 10.1038/nature09211 · DOI
  14. Kim J., 2010, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 8180, 10.1021/ja102777p · DOI
  15. Sun X. M., 2008, Nano Res., 1, 203, 10.1007/s12274-008-8021-8 · DOI
  16. Liu Z., 2008, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 130, 10876, 10.1021/ja803688x · DOI
  17. Yang X., 2008, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 17554, 10.1021/jp806751k · DOI
  18. Zhang L., 2010, Small, 6, 537, 10.1002/smll.200901680 · DOI
  19. Sun X. M., 2010, ACS Nano, 4, 3381, 10.1021/nn1000386 · DOI
  20. Green A. A., 2010, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 1, 544, 10.1021/jz900235f · DOI
  21. Rodriguez N. M., 1993, J. Mater. Res., 8, 3233, 10.1557/JMR.1993.3233 · DOI
  22. Rodriguez N. M., 1995, Langmuir, 11, 3862, 10.1021/la00010a042 · DOI
  23. Kim F., 2010, Adv. Funct. Mater., 20, 2867, 10.1002/adfm.201000736 · DOI
  24. Cote L. J., 2009, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 1043, 10.1021/ja806262m · DOI
  25. Stankovich S., 2007, Carbon, 45, 1558, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.02.034 · DOI
  26. Li D., 2008, Nature Nanotechnol., 3, 101, 10.1038/nnano.2007.451 · DOI
  27. Becerril H. c. A., 2008, ACS Nano, 2, 463, 10.1021/nn700375n · DOI
  28. Chen C., 2009, Adv. Mater., 21, 3007, 10.1002/adma.200803726 · DOI
  29. Zhu Y., 2009, Appl. Phys. Lett., 95, 103104, 10.1063/1.3212862 · DOI
  30. Kim F., 2010, Adv. Mater., 22, 1954, 10.1002/adma.200903932 · DOI
  31. Deegan R. D., 1997, Nature, 389, 827, 10.1038/39827 · DOI
  32. Deegan R. D., 2000, Phys. Rev. E, 61, 475, 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.475 · DOI
  33. Israelachvili J. N., 1992, Intermolecular and Surface Forces

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Luo, J., Cote, L. J., Tung, V. C., Tan, A. T. L., Goins, P. E., Wu, J., & Huang, J.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Huang, Jiaxing
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2010-11-24
Volume
132
Issue
50
Pages
17667-17669
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2022916713
Cited by
389
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 27
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Carbon Nanotubes in Composites
Keywords
graphene oxide, nanocolloids, chemical exfoliation, graphite nanofibers, oxidation time, colloidal stability, surface activity, charge density, CNT dispersion, aqueous dispersions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review