The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design of Organic Dyes and Cobalt Polypyridine Redox Mediators for High-Efficiency Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Open accessAbstract
Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) with cobalt-based mediators with efficiencies surpassing the record for DSCs with iodide-free electrolytes were developed by selecting a suitable combination of a cobalt polypyridine complex and an organic sensitizer. The effect of the steric properties of two triphenylamine-based organic sensitizers and a series of cobalt polypyridine redox mediators on the overall device performance in DSCs as well as on transport and recombination processes in these devices was compared. The recombination and mass-transport limitations that, previously, have been found to limit the performance of these mediators were avoided by matching the properties of the dye and the cobalt redox mediator. Organic dyes with higher extinction coefficients than the standard ruthenium sensitizers were employed in DSCs in combination with outer-sphere redox mediators, enabling thinner TiO(2) films to be used. Recombination was reduced further by introducing insulating butoxyl chains on the dye rather than on the cobalt redox mediator, enabling redox couples with higher diffusion coefficients and more suitable redox potential to be used, simultaneously improving the photocurrent and photovoltage of the device. Optimization of DSCs sensitized with a triphenylamine-based organic dye in combination with tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)cobalt(II/III) yielded solar cells with overall conversion efficiencies of 6.7% and open-circuit potentials of more than 0.9 V under 1000 W m(-2) AM1.5 G illumination. Excellent performance was also found under low light intensity indoor conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films
O'Regan, B., & Grätzel, M. (1991) · Nature · doi:10.1038/353737a0 · Cited by 28,599
Cited by
Mathew, S., Yella, A., Gao, P., Humphry-Baker, R., Curchod, B. F. E., Ashari-Astani, N., Tavernelli, I., Rothlisberger, U., Nazeeruddin, M. K., & Grätzel, M. (2014) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1861 · Cited by 4,473
Meso-Substituted Porphyrins for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells
Urbani, M., Grätzel, M., Nazeeruddin, M. K., & Torres, T. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5001964 · Cited by 940
Counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells
Wu, J., Lan, Z., Lin, J., Huang, M., Huang, Y., Fan, L., Luo, G., Lin, Y., Xie, Y., & Wei, Y. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00752j · Cited by 788
Porphyrins as excellent dyes for dye-sensitized solar cells: recent developments and insights
Higashino, T., & Imahori, H. (2015) · Dalton Transactions · doi:10.1039/c4dt02756f · Cited by 582
Dye-sensitized solar cells strike back
Muñoz-García, A. B., Benesperi, I., Boschloo, G., Concepcion, J. J., Delcamp, J. H., Gibson, E. A., Meyer, G. J., Pavone, M., Pettersson, H., Hagfeldt, A., et al. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs01336f · Cited by 544
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Feldt, S. M., Gibson, E. A., Gabrielsson, E., Sun, L., Boschloo, G., & Hagfeldt, A.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2010-11-03
- Volume
- 132
- Issue
- 46
- Pages
- 16714-16724
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2023037074
- Cited by
- 1,065
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 42.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.