The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local Nature of Substituent Effects in Stacking Interactions
Open accessAbstract
Popular explanations of substituent effects in π-stacking interactions hinge upon substituent-induced changes in the aryl π-system. This entrenched view has been used to explain substituent effects in countless stacking interactions over the past 2 decades. However, for a broad range of stacked dimers, it is shown that substituent effects are better described as arising from local, direct interactions of the substituent with the proximal vertex of the other ring. Consequently, substituent effects in stacking interactions are additive, regardless of whether the substituents are on the same or opposite rings. Substituent effects are also insensitive to the introduction of heteroatoms on distant parts of either stacked ring. This local, direct interaction viewpoint provides clear, unambiguous explanations of substituent effects for myriad stacking interactions that are in accord with robust computational data, including DFT-D and new benchmark CCSD(T) results. Many of these computational results cannot be readily explained using traditional π-polarization-based models. Analyses of stacking interactions based solely on the sign of the electrostatic potential above the face of an aromatic ring or the molecular quadrupole moment face a similar fate. The local, direct interaction model provides a simple means of analyzing substituent effects in complex aromatic systems and also offers simple explanations of the crystal packing of fluorinated benzenes and the recently published dependence of the stability of protein-RNA complexes on the regiochemistry of fluorinated base analogues [J. Am. Chem. Soc.2011, 133, 3687-3689].
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
UCSF Chimera—A visualization system for exploratory research and analysis
Pettersen, E. F., Goddard, T. D., Huang, C. C., Couch, G. S., Greenblatt, D. M., Meng, E. C., & Ferrin, T. E. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20084 · Cited by 45,828
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,648
Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction
Grimme, S. (2006) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20495 · Cited by 31,038
Boys, S. F., & Bernardi, F. (1970) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268977000101561 · Cited by 22,188
Fully optimized contracted Gaussian basis sets of triple zeta valence quality for atoms Li to Kr
Schäfer, A., Huber, C., & Ahlrichs, R. (1994) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.467146 · Cited by 9,169
The nature of .pi.-.pi. interactions
Hunter, C. A., & Sanders, J. K. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00170a016 · Cited by 5,353
Grimme, S. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20078 · Cited by 5,221
Charge Transport in Organic Semiconductors
Coropceanu, V., Cornil, J., da Silva Filho, D. A., Olivier, Y., Silbey, R., & Brédas, J.-L. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr050140x · Cited by 4,607
Interactions with Aromatic Rings in Chemical and Biological Recognition
Meyer, E. A., Castellano, R. K., & Diederich, F. (2003) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200390319 · Cited by 3,541
Ma, J. C., & Dougherty, D. A. (1997) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9603744 · Cited by 3,477
Cited by
Control of π–π Stacking via Crystal Engineering in Organic Conjugated Small Molecule Crystals
Yao, Z.-F., Wang, J.-Y., & Pei, J. (2018) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.7b01385 · Cited by 328
Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Ludovic Terren, L. T., & Rosa Borge-Bravo, R. B.-B. (2021) · Review of Communication Research · doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.028 · Cited by 272
Guerrero-Solé, F. (2018) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305118808776 · Cited by 75
Sui, S.-F. (2021) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-biophys-062920-063657 · Cited by 72
Guerrero-Solé, F., & Lopez-Gonzalez, H. (2019) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439317744163 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Wheeler, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-06-09
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 10262-10274
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2326385719
- Cited by
- 466
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 23.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.