The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450?
Open accessAbstract
The cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes are important in many areas, including pharmaceutical development. Subtle changes in the electronic structure of the active species, Compound I, have been postulated previously to account partly for the experimentally observed differences in reactivity between isoforms. Current predictive models of CYP metabolism typically assume an identical Compound I in all isoforms. Here we present a method to calculate the electronic structure and to estimate the Fe-O bond enthalpy of Compound I, and apply it to several human and bacterial CYP isoforms. Conformational flexibility is accounted for by sampling large numbers of structures from molecular dynamics simulations, which are subsequently optimized with density functional theory (B3LYP) based quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics. The observed differences in Compound I between human isoforms are small: They are generally smaller than the spread of values obtained for the same isoform starting from different initial structures. Hence, it is unlikely that the variation in activity between human isoforms is due to differences in the electronic structure of Compound I. A larger difference in electronic structure is observed between the human isoforms and P450(cam) and may be explained by the slightly different hydrogen-bonding environment surrounding the cysteinyl sulfur. The presence of substrate in the active site of all isoforms studied appears to cause a slight decrease in the Fe-O bond enthalpy, apparently due to displacement of water out of the active site, suggesting that Compound I is less stable in the presence of substrate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Toward in silico structure-based ADMET prediction in drug discovery
Moroy, G., Martiny, V. Y., Vayer, P., Villoutreix, B. O., & Miteva, M. A. (2012) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2011.10.023 · Cited by 302
Computational Prediction of Metabolism: Sites, Products, SAR, P450 Enzyme Dynamics, and Mechanisms
Kirchmair, J., Williamson, M. J., Tyzack, J. D., Tan, L., Bond, P. J., Bender, A., & Glen, R. C. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/ci200542m · Cited by 289
Goings, J. J., White, A., Lee, J., Tautermann, C. S., Degroote, M., Gidney, C., Shiozaki, T., Babbush, R., & Rubin, N. C. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2203533119 · Cited by 127
Metadata
- Authors
- Lonsdale, R., Oláh, J., Mulholland, A. J., & Harvey, J. N.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-09-12
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 15464-15474
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2031843399
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja203157u
- The paper
- Lonsdale, R., Oláh, J., Mulholland, A. J., & Harvey, J. N. (2011). Does Compound I Vary Significantly between Isoforms of Cytochrome P450? Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja203157u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.