The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical Evaluation of Structural Models of the S2 State in the Oxygen Evolving Complex of Photosystem II: Protonation States and Magnetic Interactions
Abstract
Protonation states of water ligands and oxo bridges are intimately involved in tuning the electronic structures and oxidation potentials of the oxygen evolving complex (OEC) in Photosystem II, steering the mechanistic pathway, which involves at least five redox state intermediates S(n) (n = 0-4) resulting in the oxidation of water to molecular oxygen. Although protons are practically invisible in protein crystallography, their effects on the electronic structure and magnetic properties of metal active sites can be probed using spectroscopy. With the twin purpose of aiding the interpretation of the complex electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic data of the OEC and of improving the view of the cluster at the atomic level, a complete set of protonation configurations for the S(2) state of the OEC were investigated, and their distinctive effects on magnetic properties of the cluster were evaluated. The most recent X-ray structure of Photosystem II at 1.9 Å resolution was used and refined to obtain the optimum structure for the Mn(4)O(5)Ca core within the protein pocket. Employing this model, a set of 26 structures was constructed that tested various protonation scenarios of the water ligands and oxo bridges. Our results suggest that one of the two water molecules that are proposed to coordinate the outer Mn ion (Mn(A)) of the cluster is deprotonated in the S(2) state, as this leads to optimal experimental agreement, reproducing the correct ground state spin multiplicity (S = 1/2), spin expectation values, and EXAFS-derived metal-metal distances. Deprotonation of Ca(2+)-bound water molecules is strongly disfavored in the S(2) state, but dissociation of one of the two water ligands appears to be facile. The computed isotropic hyperfine couplings presented here allow distinctions between models to be made and call into question the assumption that the largest coupling is always attributable to Mn(III). The present results impose limits for the total charge and the proton configuration of the OEC in the S(2) state, with implications for the cascade of events in the Kok cycle and for the water splitting mechanism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S., & Krieg, H. (2010) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3382344 · Cited by 59,686
Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior
Becke, A. D. (1988) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.38.3098 · Cited by 53,711
Semiempirical GGA‐type density functional constructed with a long‐range dispersion correction
Grimme, S. (2006) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20495 · Cited by 31,038
Weigend, F., & Ahlrichs, R. (2005) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b508541a · Cited by 30,598
Density-functional approximation for the correlation energy of the inhomogeneous electron gas
Perdew, J. P. (1986) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.33.8822 · Cited by 18,777
Klamt, A., & Schüürmann, G. (1993) · J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 · doi:10.1039/p29930000799 · Cited by 9,445
Accurate Coulomb-fitting basis sets for H to Rn
Weigend, F. (2006) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/b515623h · Cited by 8,994
Powering the planet: Chemical challenges in solar energy utilization
Lewis, N. S., & Nocera, D. G. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0603395103 · Cited by 8,310
Grimme, S. (2004) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.20078 · Cited by 5,221
Relativistic regular two-component Hamiltonians
Lenthe, E. V., Baerends, E. J., & Snijders, J. G. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.466059 · Cited by 4,385
Cited by
Serial time-resolved crystallography of photosystem II using a femtosecond X-ray laser
Kupitz, C., Basu, S., Grotjohann, I., Fromme, R., Zatsepin, N. A., Rendek, K. N., Hunter, M. S., Shoeman, R. L., White, T. A., Wang, D., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13453 · Cited by 477
Metadata
- Authors
- Ames, W., Pantazis, D. A., Krewald, V., Cox, N., Messinger, J., Lubitz, W., & Neese, F.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-11-17
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 49
- Pages
- 19743-19757
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1977055255
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 11.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theoretical Evaluation of Structural Models of the S2 State in the Oxygen Evolving Complex of Photosystem II: Protonation States and Magnetic Interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja2041805
- The paper
- Ames, W., Pantazis, D. A., Krewald, V., Cox, N., Messinger, J., Lubitz, W., & Neese, F. (2011). Theoretical Evaluation of Structural Models of the S2 State in the Oxygen Evolving Complex of Photosystem II: Protonation States and Magnetic Interactions. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2041805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.