The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chiral Phosphoric Acid-Catalyzed Enantioselective Three-Component Povarov Reaction Using Enecarbamates as Dienophiles: Highly Diastereo- and Enantioselective Synthesis of Substituted 4-Aminotetrahydroquinolines
Open accessAbstract
A chiral phosphoric acid (5)-catalyzed three-component Povarov reaction of aldehydes 2, anilines 3, and enecarbamates 4 afforded cis-4-amino-2-aryl(alkyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines 1 in high yields with excellent diastereoselectivities (>95%) and almost complete enantioselectivities (up to >99% ee). The reaction was applicable to a wide range of anilines bearing electron-donating (OMe) and electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., Cl, CF(3), NO(2)) and allowed, for the first time, aliphatic aldehydes to be employed in the enantioselective Povarov reaction. With β-substituted acyclic enecarbamates, 2,3,4-trisubstituted 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolines with three contiguous stereogenic centers were produced in excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivities (87 to >99% ee). A detailed study of the active catalytic species allowed us to reduce the catalyst loading from 10% to 0.5% with no deterioration of enantiomeric excess. In addition, mechanistic studies allowed us to conclude unequivocally that the Povarov reaction involving enecarbamate as dienophile proceeded via a stepwise mechanism. The key role of the free NH function of the enecarbamate in the success of this transformation was demonstrated. NMR experiments indicating the catalyst-substrate interaction as well as a linear correlation between catalyst and product ee's were also documented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Small-Molecule H-Bond Donors in Asymmetric Catalysis
Doyle, A. G., & Jacobsen, E. N. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068373r · Cited by 2,608
Akiyama, T. (2007) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068374j · Cited by 2,311
Evano, G., Blanchard, N., & Toumi, M. (2008) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr8002505 · Cited by 2,138
Enantioselective Mannich‐Type Reaction Catalyzed by a Chiral Brønsted Acid
Akiyama, T., Itoh, J., Yokota, K., & Fuchibe, K. (2004) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200353240 · Cited by 1,679
Asymmetric Organocatalytic Domino Reactions
Enders, D., Grondal, C., & Hüttl, M. R. M. (2007) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200603129 · Cited by 1,624
Chiral Brønsted Acid-Catalyzed Direct Mannich Reactions via Electrophilic Activation
Uraguchi, D., & Terada, M. (2004) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0491533 · Cited by 1,616
Cohen, Y., Avram, L., & Frish, L. (2005) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200300637 · Cited by 1,122
Yu, J., Shi, F., & Gong, L.-Z. (2011) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar2000343 · Cited by 903
From Limestone to Catalysis: Application of Calcium Compounds as Homogeneous Catalysts
Harder, S. (2010) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr9003659 · Cited by 642
When Organocatalysis Meets Transition‐Metal Catalysis
Zhong, C., & Shi, X. (2010) · European Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1002/ejoc.201000004 · Cited by 607
Cited by
Parmar, D., Sugiono, E., Raja, S., & Rueping, M. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5001496 · Cited by 2,118
Metadata
- Authors
- Dagousset, G., Zhu, J., & Masson, G.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-26
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 14804-14813
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2070921346
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 15.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.