The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficient Ternary Blend Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells with Tunable Open-Circuit Voltage
Abstract
To explore the potential of ternary blend bulk heterojunction (BHJ) photovoltaics as a general platform for increasing the attainable performance of organic solar cells, a model system based on poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) as the donor and two soluble fullerene acceptors, phenyl-C(61)-butyric acid methyl ester (PC(61)BM) and indene-C(60) bisadduct (ICBA), was examined. In all of the solar cells, the overall ratio of polymer to fullerene was maintained at 1:1, while the composition of the fullerene component (PC(61)BM:ICBA ratio) was varied. Photovoltaic devices showed high short-circuit current densities (J(sc)) and fill factors (FF) (>0.57) at all fullerene ratios, while the open-circuit voltage (V(oc)) was found to vary from 0.61 to 0.84 V as the fraction of ICBA was increased. These results indicate that the V(oc) in ternary blend BHJ solar cells is not limited to the smallest V(oc) of the corresponding binary blend solar cells but can be varied between the extreme V(oc) values without significant effect on the J(sc) or FF. By extension, this result suggests that ternary blends provide a potentially effective route toward maximizing the attainable J(sc)V(oc) product (which is directly proportional to the solar cell efficiency) in BHJ solar cells and that with judicious selection of donor and acceptor components, solar cells with efficiencies exceeding the theoretical limits for binary blend solar cells could be possible without sacrificing the simplicity of a single active-layer processing step.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chen, C.-H., Hsieh, C.-H., Dubosc, M., Cheng, Y.-J., & Hsu, C.-S. (2010) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma902206u · Cited by 195
Cooling, N., Burke, K. B., Zhou, X., Lind, S. J., Gordon, K. C., Jones, T. W., Dastoor, P. C., & Belcher, W. J. (2011) · Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells · doi:10.1016/j.solmat.2011.01.046 · Cited by 38
Cited by
Next-generation organic photovoltaics based on non-fullerene acceptors
Cheng, P., Li, G., Zhan, X., & Yang, Y. (2018) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0104-9 · Cited by 1,905
Wadsworth, A., Moser, M., Marks, A., Little, M. S., Gasparini, N., Brabec, C. J., Baran, D., & McCulloch, I. (2019) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00892a · Cited by 986
16.67% Rigid and 14.06% Flexible Organic Solar Cells Enabled by Ternary Heterojunction Strategy
Yan, T., Song, W., Huang, J., Peng, R., Huang, L., & Ge, Z. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902210 · Cited by 579
High-performance multiple-donor bulk heterojunction solar cells
Yang, Y. (., Chen, W., Dou, L., Chang, W.-H., Duan, H.-S., Bob, B., Li, G., & Yang, Y. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.9 · Cited by 527
Advantages, challenges and molecular design of different material types used in organic solar cells
Yi, J., Zhang, G., Yu, H., & Yan, H. (2023) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-023-00618-1 · Cited by 522
Metadata
- Authors
- Khlyabich, P. P., Burkhart, B., & Thompson, B. C.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2011-08-30
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 37
- Pages
- 14534-14537
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2042387549
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.