Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 380

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Co–Ln Mixed-Metal Phosphonate Grids and Cages as Molecular Magnetic Refrigerants

Zheng, Yan-Zhen, Evangelisti, Marco, Tuna, Floriana, Winpenny, Richard E. P.·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The synthesis, structures, and magnetic properties of six families of cobalt-lanthanide mixed-metal phosphonate complexes are reported in this Article. These six families can be divided into two structural types: grids, where the metal centers lie in a single plane, and cages. The grids include [4 × 3] {Co(8)Ln(4)}, [3 × 3] {Co(4)Ln(6)}, and [2 × 2] {Co(4)Ln(2)} families and a [4 × 4] {Co(8)Ln(8)} family where the central 2 × 2 square is rotated with respect to the external square. The cages include {Co(6)Ln(8)} and {Co(8)Ln(2)} families. Magnetic studies have been performed for these compounds, and for each family, the maximum magnetocaloric effect (MCE) has been observed for the Ln = Gd derivative, with a smaller MCE for the compounds containing magnetically anisotropic 4f-ions. The resulting entropy changes of the gadolinium derivatives are (for 3 K and 7 T) 11.8 J kg(-1) K(-1) for {Co(8)Gd(2)}; 20.0 J kg(-1) K(-1) for {Co(4)Gd(2)}; 21.1 J kg(-1) K(-1) for {Co(8)Gd(4)}; 21.4 J kg(-1) K(-1) for {Co(8)Gd(8)}; 23.6 J kg(-1) K(-1) for {Co(4)Gd(6)}; and 28.6 J kg(-1) K(-1) for {Co(6)Gd(8)}, from which we can see these values are proportional to the percentage of the gadolinium in the core.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja208367k

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zheng, Y.-Z., Evangelisti, M., Tuna, F., & Winpenny, R. E. P.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-01-06
Volume
134
Issue
2
Pages
1057-1065
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2172268919
Cited by
380
References
0
FWCI
16.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.