The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Key Mechanistic Features of Enantioselective C–H Bond Activation Reactions Catalyzed by [(Chiral Mono-N-Protected Amino Acid)–Pd(II)] Complexes
Abstract
Monoprotected chiral amino acids have recently been established as a class of ligand scaffolds for effecting Pd-catalyzed enantioselective C-H bond activation reactions. However, to elucidate the mechanistic details and controlling factors of these reactions, more comprehensive studies are needed. In this work we report computational investigations into the key mechanistic features of enantioselective C-H bond activation reactions catalyzed by a [chiral (mono-N-protected amino acid)-Pd(II)] complex. Structural analysis points to a C-H insertion intermediate in which the nitrogen atom of the ligand is bound as a neutral σ-donor. The formation of this C-H insertion intermediate could, in principle, proceed via a "direct C-H cleavage" or via "initial N-H bond cleavage followed by C-H cleavage". The computational studies presented herein show that the pathway initiated by N-H bond cleavage is more kinetically favorable. It is shown that the first step of the reaction is the N-H bond cleavage by the coordinated acetate group (OAc). In the next stage, the weakly coordinated OAc(-) (the second acetate group) activates the ortho-C-H bond of the substrate and transfers the H-atom from the C-atom to the bound N-atom of the ligand. As a result, a new Pd-C bond is formed and the carbamate is converted from X-type to L-type ligand. The absolute configuration of the products that are predicted on the basis of the calculated energies of the transition states matches the experimental data. The calculated enantioselectivity is also comparable with the experimental result. On the basis of these data, the origin of the enantioselectivity can be largely attributed to steric repulsions in the transition states.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new mixing of Hartree–Fock and local density-functional theories
Becke, A. D. (1993) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.464304 · Cited by 16,515
Cited by
Organocatalysis in Inert C–H Bond Functionalization
Qin, Y., Zhu, L., & Luo, S. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00657 · Cited by 785
Davies, D. L., Macgregor, S. A., & McMullin, C. L. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00839 · Cited by 585
Engle, K. M., & Yu, J.-Q. (2013) · The Journal of Organic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jo400159y · Cited by 531
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Musaev, D. G., Kaledin, A., Shi, B.-F., & Yu, J.-Q.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-01-09
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1690-1698
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2008036052
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key Mechanistic Features of Enantioselective C–H Bond Activation Reactions Catalyzed by [(Chiral Mono-N-Protected Amino Acid)–Pd(II)] Complexes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja208661v
- The paper
- Musaev, D. G., Kaledin, A., Shi, B.-F., & Yu, J.-Q. (2012). Key Mechanistic Features of Enantioselective C–H Bond Activation Reactions Catalyzed by [(Chiral Mono-N-Protected Amino Acid)–Pd(II)] Complexes. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja208661v
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.