The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Polymeric Dibromomaleimides As Extremely Efficient Disulfide Bridging Bioconjugation and Pegylation Agents
Abstract
A series of dibromomaleimides have been shown to be very efficacious at insertion into peptidic disulfide bonds. This conjugation proceeds with a stoichiometric balance of reagents in buffered solutions in less than 15 min to give discrete products while maintaining the disulfide bridge and thus peptide conformation. The insertion is initiated by disulfide reduction using a water-soluble phosphine, tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) which allows for subsequent substitution of the two maleimide bromides by the generated thiols. Reaction of salmon calcitonin (sCT) with 2,3-dibromomaleimide (1.1 excess) in the presence of TCEP (1.1 equiv) in aqueous solution at pH 6.2 gives complete production of a single conjugate which requires no workup. A linear methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) was functionalized via a Mitsunobu reaction and used for the successful site-specific and rapid pegylation of sCT. This reaction occurs in 15 min with a small stoichiometry excess of the pegylating agent to give insertion at the disulfide with HPLC showing a single product and MALDI-ToF confirming conjugation. Attempts to use the group in a functional ATRP polymerization initiator led to polymerization inhibition. Thus, in order to prepare a range of functional polymers an indirect route was chosen via both azide and aniline functional initiators which were converted to 2,3-dibromomaleimides via appropriate reactions. For example, the azide functional polymer was reacted via a Huisgen CuAAC click reaction to an alkyne functional 2,3-dibromomaleimide. This new reagent allowed for the synthesis of conjugates of sCT with comb polymers derived from PEG methacrylic monomers which in addition gave appropriate cloud points. This reaction represents a highly efficient polymer conjugation method which circumvents problems of purification which normally arise from having to use large excesses of the conjugate. In addition, the tertiary structure of the peptide is efficiently maintained.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wang, J.-S., & Matyjaszewski, K. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00125a035 · Cited by 4,622
Poly(ethylene glycol) in Drug Delivery: Pros and Cons as Well as Potential Alternatives
Knop, K., Hoogenboom, R., Fischer, D., & Schubert, U. S. (2010) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200902672 · Cited by 3,533
Kato, M., Kamigaito, M., Sawamoto, M., & Higashimura, T. (1995) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma00109a056 · Cited by 3,046
Cited by
Polymer–drug conjugate therapeutics: advances, insights and prospects
Ekladious, I., Colson, Y. L., & Grinstaff, M. W. (2019) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-018-0005-0 · Cited by 855
Therapeutic Protein–Polymer Conjugates: Advancing Beyond PEGylation
Pelegri-O’Day, E. M., Lin, E.-W., & Maynard, H. D. (2014) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja504390x · Cited by 622
Hamley, I. W. (2014) · Biomacromolecules · doi:10.1021/bm500246w · Cited by 300
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, M. W., Strickland, R. A., Schumacher, F. F., Caddick, S., Baker, J. R., Gibson, M. I., & Haddleton, D. M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-01-13
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1847-1852
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2030857516
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.