Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Water Fosters a Remarkable 5-Fold Increase in Low-Pressure CO2 Uptake within Mesoporous MIL-100(Fe)

Soubeyrand-Lenoir, Estelle, Vagner, Christelle, Yoon, Ji Woong, Bazin, Philippe, Ragon, Florence, Hwang, Young Kyu, Serre, Christian, Chang, Jong-San, Llewellyn, Philip L.·2012·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

The uptake and adsorption enthalpy of carbon dioxide at 0.2 bar have been studied in three different topical porous MOF samples, HKUST-1, UiO-66(Zr), and MIL-100(Fe), after having been pre-equilibrated under different relative humidities (3, 10, 20, 40%) of water vapor. If in the case of microporous UiO-66, CO(2) uptake remained similar whatever the relative humidity, and correlations were difficult for microporous HKUST-1 due to its relative instability toward water vapor. In the case of MIL-100(Fe), a remarkable 5-fold increase in CO(2) uptake was observed with increasing RH, up to 105 mg g(-1) CO(2) at 40% RH, in parallel with a large decrease in enthalpy measured. Cycling measurements show slight differences for the initial three cycles and complete reversibility with further cycles. These results suggest an enhanced solubility of CO(2) in the water-filled mesopores of MIL-100(Fe).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja302787x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Soubeyrand-Lenoir, E., Vagner, C., Yoon, J. W., Bazin, P., Ragon, F., Hwang, Y. K., Serre, C., Chang, J.-S., & Llewellyn, P. L.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2012-06-11
Volume
134
Issue
24
Pages
10174-10181
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2323873465
Cited by
234
References
1
FWCI
10.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.