The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Porous Metalloporphyrinic Frameworks Constructed from Metal 5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(3,5-biscarboxylphenyl)porphyrin for Highly Efficient and Selective Catalytic Oxidation of Alkylbenzenes
Abstract
We incorporate metal 5,10,15,20-tetrakis(3,5-biscarboxylphenyl)porphyrin (M-H(8)OCPP), for the first time, into porous metal-organic frameworks. The self-assembled porous metalloporphyrinic frameworks [Mn(5)Cl(2)(MnCl-OCPP)(DMF)(4)(H(2)O)(4)]·2DMF·8CH(3)COOH·14H(2)O (ZJU-18; ZJU = Zhejiang University), [Mn(5)Cl(2)(Ni-OCPP)(H(2)O)(8)]·7DMF·6CH(3)COOH·11H(2)O (ZJU-19), and [Cd(5)Cl(2)(MnCl-OCPP)(H(2)O)(6)]·13DMF·2CH(3)COOH·9H(2)O (ZJU-20) are isostructural as revealed by their single X-ray crystal structures. The metalloporphyrin octacarboxylates (M-OCPP) (M = Mn(III)Cl for ZJU-18 and ZJU-20, M = Ni(II) for ZJU-19) are bridged by binuclear and trinuclear metal carboxylate secondary building units to form a 3-periodic, binodal, edge-transitive net with Reticular Chemistry Structure Resource symbol tbo with pore windows of about 11.5 Å and pore cages about 21.3 Å in diameter. The porous nature of these metalloporphyrinic frameworks is further established by sorption studies in which different substrates such as ethanol, acetonitrile, acetone, cyclohexane, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and acetophenone can readily have access to the pores. Their catalytic activities for the oxidation of alkylbenzenes were examined at 65 °C using tert-butyl hydroperoxide as the oxidant. The results indicate that ZJU-18 is much superior to ZJU-19, ZJU-20, and homogeneous molecular MnCl-Me(8)OCPP, exhibiting highly efficient and selective oxidation of ethylbenzene to acetophenone in quantitative >99% yield and a turnover number of 8076 after 48 h.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Cited by
Porous Metal–Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Biomimetic Catalysis
Zhao, M., Ou, S., & Wu, C.-D. (2014) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar400265x · Cited by 722
Self-citationWang, Y.-R., Huang, Q., He, C.-T., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Shen, F.-C., & Lan, Y.-Q. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06938-z · Cited by 482
A Base-Resistant Metalloporphyrin Metal–Organic Framework for C–H Bond Halogenation
Lv, X.-L., Wang, K., Wang, B., Su, J., Zou, X., Xie, Y., Li, J.-R., & Zhou, H.-C. (2017) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.6b09463 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, X.-L., Xie, M.-H., Zou, C., He, Y., Chen, B., O’Keeffe, M., & Wu, C.-D.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2012-06-15
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 10638-10645
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1992992666
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.