The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton-Conductive Magnetic Metal–Organic Frameworks, {NR3(CH2COOH)}[MaIIMbIII(ox)3]: Effect of Carboxyl Residue upon Proton Conduction
Abstract
Proton-conductive magnetic metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), {NR(3)(CH(2)COOH)}[M(a)(II)M(b)(III)(ox)(3)] (abbreviated as R-M(a)M(b): R = ethyl (Et), n-butyl (Bu); M(a)M(b) = MnCr, FeCr, FeFe) have been studied. The following six MOFs were prepared: Et-MnCr·2H(2)O, Et-FeCr·2H(2)O, Et-FeFe·2H(2)O, Bu-MnCr, Bu-FeCr, and Bu-FeFe. The structure of Bu-MnCr was determined by X-ray crystallography. Crystal data: trigonal, R3c (#161), a = 9.3928(13) Å, c = 51.0080(13) Å, Z = 6. The crystal consists of oxalate-bridged bimetallic layers interleaved by {NBu(3)(CH(2)COOH)}(+) ions. Et-MnCr·2H(2)O and Bu-MnCr (R-MnCr MOFs) show a ferromagnetic ordering with T(C) of 5.5-5.9 K, and Et-FeCr·2H(2)O and Bu-FeCr (R-FeCr MOFs) also show a ferromagnetic ordering with T(C) of 11.0-11.5 K. Et-FeFe·2H(2)O and Bu-FeFe (R-FeFe MOFs) belong to the class II of mixed-valence compounds and show the magnetism characteristic of Néel N-type ferrimagnets. The Et-MOFs (Et-MnCr·2H(2)O, Et-FeCr·2H(2)O and Et-FeFe·2H(2)O) show high proton conduction, whereas the Bu-MOFs (Bu-MnCr, Bu-FeCr, and Bu-FeFe) show moderate proton conduction. Together with water adsorption isotherm studies, the significance of the carboxyl residues as proton carriers is revealed. The R-MnCr MOFs and the R-FeCr MOFs are rare examples of coexistent ferromagnetism and proton conduction, and the R-FeFe MOFs are the first examples of coexistent Néel N-type ferrimagnetism and proton conduction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On the development of proton conducting polymer membranes for hydrogen and methanol fuel cells
Kreuer, K. D. (2001) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(00)00632-3 · Cited by 2,969
On the development of proton conducting materials for technological applications
Kreuer, K. D. (1997) · Solid State Ionics · doi:10.1016/s0167-2738(97)00082-9 · Cited by 1,036
Cited by
Metal–organic frameworks as platforms for clean energy
Li, S.-L., & Xu, Q. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40507a · Cited by 970
Proton-conducting crystalline porous materials
Meng, X., Wang, H.-N., Song, S.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00528d · Cited by 697
Template-directed synthesis of metal–organic materials
Zhang, Z., & Zaworotko, M. J. (2014) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c4cs00075g · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- O̅kawa, H., Sadakiyo, M., Yamada, T., Maesato, M., Ohba, M., & Kitagawa, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-02-04
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2256-2262
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2063153106
- Cited by
- 220
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Proton-Conductive Magnetic Metal–Organic Frameworks, {NR3(CH2COOH)}[MaIIMbIII(ox)3]: Effect of Carboxyl Residue upon Proton Conduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja309968u
- The paper
- O̅kawa, H., Sadakiyo, M., Yamada, T., Maesato, M., Ohba, M., & Kitagawa, H. (2013). Proton-Conductive Magnetic Metal–Organic Frameworks, {NR3(CH2COOH)}[MaIIMbIII(ox)3]: Effect of Carboxyl Residue upon Proton Conduction. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja309968u
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.