Cited by 84Biochemical and Structural CharacterizationProtein Structure and DynamicsChemical Synthesis and Analysis

Extein Residues Play an Intimate Role in the Rate-Limiting Step of Protein Trans -Splicing

Open access
Shah, Neel H., Eryilmaz, Ertan, Cowburn, David, Muir, Tom W.·2013·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

Split inteins play an important role in modern protein semisynthesis techniques. These naturally occurring protein splicing domains can be used for in vitro and in vivo protein modification, peptide and protein cyclization, segmental isotopic labeling, and the construction of biosensors. The most well-characterized family of split inteins, the cyanobacterial DnaE inteins, show particular promise, as many of these can splice proteins in less than 1 min. Despite this fact, the activity of these inteins is context-dependent: certain peptide sequences surrounding their ligation junction (called local N- and C-exteins) are strongly preferred, while other sequences cause a dramatic reduction in the splicing kinetics and yield. These sequence constraints limit the utility of inteins, and thus, a more detailed understanding of their participation in protein splicing is needed. Here we present a thorough kinetic analysis of the relationship between C-extein composition and split intein activity. The results of these experiments were used to guide structural and molecular dynamics studies, which revealed that the motions of catalytic residues are constrained by the second C-extein residue, likely forcing them into an active conformation that promotes rapid protein splicing. Together, our structural and functional studies also highlight a key region of the intein structure that can be re-engineered to increase intein promiscuity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja401015p

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When split-inteins find each other, they undergo spontaneous self-excision while mediating ligation of the two protein halves, as long as the first residue of the 3ʹ half is a Cys, Ser, or Thr.

    “When split-inteins find each other, they undergo spontaneous self-excision while mediating ligation of the two protein halves, as long as the first residue of the 3ʹ half is a Cys, Ser, or Thr [62].”

    From Circumventing the packaging limit of AAV-mediated gene replacement therapy for neurological disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [62]

    The Introduction describes split inteins associating, excising themselves, and ligating their flanking protein sequences. It also says different intein families can use Cys, Ser, or Thr as nucleophiles. But it does not support the claim that splicing occurs *as long as* the first residue is one of those three: the Introduction says other nearby extein residues can greatly diminish or abolish splicing. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Volkmann G.; Mootz H. D. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 1185– 1206. 22926412 PMC11113529
  2. Shah N. H.; Muir T. W. Isr. J. Chem. 2011, 51, 854– 861. 23620603 PMC3633520
  3. Shi J.; Muir T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6198– 6206. 15853324
  4. Southworth M.; Amaya K.; Evans T.; Xu M.; Perler F. Biotechniques 1999, 27, 110– 120. 10407673
  5. Iwai H.; Züger S.; Jin J.; Tam P.-H. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1853– 1858. 16516207
  6. Amitai G.; Callahan B. P.; Stanger M. J.; Belfort G.; Belfort M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 11005– 11010. 19541659 PMC2708771
  7. Lockless S. W.; Muir T. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 10999– 11004. 19541616 PMC2708728
  8. Shemella P. T.; Topilina N. I.; Soga I.; Pereira B.; Belfort G.; Belfort M.; Nayak S. K. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, 2217– 2225. 21539790 PMC3149237
  9. Shah N. H.; Dann G. P.; Vila-Perelló M.; Liu Z.; Muir T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11338– 11341. 22734434 PMC3535263
  10. Cheriyan M.; Pedamallu C. S.; Tori K.; Perler F. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 6202– 6211. 23306197 PMC3585056
  11. Pietrokovski S. Trends Genet. 2001, 17, 465– 472. 11485819
  12. Vila-Perelló M.; Muir T. W. Cell 2010, 143, 191– 200. 20946979 PMC3004290
  13. Caspi J.; Amitai G.; Belenkiy O.; Pietrokovski S. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 1569– 1577. 14651639 PMC7168405
  14. Martin D. D.; Xu M. Q.; Evans T. C. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 1393– 1402. 11170467
  15. Dassa B.; Amitai G.; Caspi J.; Schueler-Furman O.; Pietrokovski S. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 322– 330. 17198403
  16. Zettler J.; Schütz V.; Mootz H. D. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 909– 914. 19302791
  17. Dhar T.; Mootz H. D. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3063– 3065. 21234473
  18. Borra R.; Dong D.; Elnagar A. Y.; Woldemariam G. A.; Camarero J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6344– 6353. 22404648 PMC3324671
  19. Vila-Perelló M.; Liu Z.; Shah N. H.; Willis J. A.; Idoyaga J.; Muir T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 286– 292. 23265282 PMC3544275
  20. Busche A. E. L.; Aranko A. S.; Talebzadeh-Farooji M.; Bernhard F.; Dötsch V.; Iwaï H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6128– 6131. 19591176
  21. Muona M.; Aranko A. S.; Raulinaitis V.; Iwaï H. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 574– 587. 20203672
  22. Jagadish K.; Borra R.; Lacey V.; Majumder S.; Shekhtman A.; Wang L.; Camarero J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3126– 3131. PMC3767473 23322720
  23. Zhang Y.; Yang W.; Chen L.; Shi Y.; Li G.; Zhou N. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 417, 65– 72. 21726524
  24. Wong S.; Mills E.; Truong K. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 2012, 26, 207– 213. 23223808
  25. Shah N. H.; Vila-Perelló M.; Muir T. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6511– 6515. PMC3230118 21656885
  26. Muir T. W.; Sondhi D.; Cole P. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 6705– 6710. 9618476 PMC22605
  27. Frutos S.; Goger M.; Giovani B.; Cowburn D.; Muir T. W. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 527– 533. 20495572 PMC2889191
  28. Oeemig J. S.; Aranko A. S.; Djupsjöbacka J.; Heinämäki K.; Iwaï H. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1451– 1456. 19344715
  29. Sun P.; Ye S.; Ferrandon S.; Evans T. C.; Xu M.-Q.; Rao Z. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 353, 1093– 1105. 16219320
  30. Callahan B. P.; Topilina N. I.; Stanger M. J.; Van Roey P.; Belfort M. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 630– 633. 21460844 PMC3087850
  31. Chen L.; Benner J.; Perler F. B. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 20431– 20435. 10770923
  32. Appleby-Tagoe J. H.; Thiel I. V.; Wang Y.; Wang Y.; Mootz H. D.; Liu X.-Q. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 34440– 34447. 21832069 PMC3190829
  33. Sattler M.; Schleucher J.; Griesinger C. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1999, 34, 93– 158.
  34. Palmer A. G.; Cavanagh J.; Wright P. E.; Rance M. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 93, 151– 170.
  35. Kay L. E.; Keifer P.; Saarinen T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10663– 10665.
  36. Schleucher J.; Schwendinger M.; Sattler M.; Schmidt P.; Schedletzky O.; Glaser S. J.; Sørensen O. W.; Griesinger C. J. Biomol. NMR 1994, 4, 301– 306. 8019138
  37. Götz A. W.; Williamson M. J.; Xu D.; Poole D.; Le Grand S.; Walker R. C. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2012, 8, 1542– 1555. 22582031 PMC3348677
  38. Pettersen E. F.; Goddard T. D.; Huang C. C.; Couch G. S.; Greenblatt D. M.; Meng E. C.; Ferrin T. E. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605– 1612. 15264254

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, N. H., Eryilmaz, E., Cowburn, D., & Muir, T. W.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Muir, Tom W.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2013-04-02
Volume
135
Issue
15
Pages
5839-5847
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2019671033
Cited by
84
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
split intein, protein trans-splicing, splicing kinetics, catalytic residues, protein semisynthesis, molecular dynamics
MeSH terms
Kinetics, Movement, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Trans-Splicing, Catalytic Domain, Exteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review