Extein Residues Play an Intimate Role in the Rate-Limiting Step of Protein Trans -Splicing
Open accessAbstract
Split inteins play an important role in modern protein semisynthesis techniques. These naturally occurring protein splicing domains can be used for in vitro and in vivo protein modification, peptide and protein cyclization, segmental isotopic labeling, and the construction of biosensors. The most well-characterized family of split inteins, the cyanobacterial DnaE inteins, show particular promise, as many of these can splice proteins in less than 1 min. Despite this fact, the activity of these inteins is context-dependent: certain peptide sequences surrounding their ligation junction (called local N- and C-exteins) are strongly preferred, while other sequences cause a dramatic reduction in the splicing kinetics and yield. These sequence constraints limit the utility of inteins, and thus, a more detailed understanding of their participation in protein splicing is needed. Here we present a thorough kinetic analysis of the relationship between C-extein composition and split intein activity. The results of these experiments were used to guide structural and molecular dynamics studies, which revealed that the motions of catalytic residues are constrained by the second C-extein residue, likely forcing them into an active conformation that promotes rapid protein splicing. Together, our structural and functional studies also highlight a key region of the intein structure that can be re-engineered to increase intein promiscuity.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When split-inteins find each other, they undergo spontaneous self-excision while mediating ligation of the two protein halves, as long as the first residue of the 3ʹ half is a Cys, Ser, or Thr.
“When split-inteins find each other, they undergo spontaneous self-excision while mediating ligation of the two protein halves, as long as the first residue of the 3ʹ half is a Cys, Ser, or Thr [62].”
From Circumventing the packaging limit of AAV-mediated gene replacement therapy for neurological disorders (2022) · cites this paper as [62]
The Introduction describes split inteins associating, excising themselves, and ligating their flanking protein sequences. It also says different intein families can use Cys, Ser, or Thr as nucleophiles. But it does not support the claim that splicing occurs *as long as* the first residue is one of those three: the Introduction says other nearby extein residues can greatly diminish or abolish splicing. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 38
- Volkmann G.; Mootz H. D. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2013, 70, 1185– 1206. 22926412 PMC11113529
- Shah N. H.; Muir T. W. Isr. J. Chem. 2011, 51, 854– 861. 23620603 PMC3633520
- Shi J.; Muir T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 6198– 6206. 15853324
- Southworth M.; Amaya K.; Evans T.; Xu M.; Perler F. Biotechniques 1999, 27, 110– 120. 10407673
- Iwai H.; Züger S.; Jin J.; Tam P.-H. FEBS Lett. 2006, 580, 1853– 1858. 16516207
- Amitai G.; Callahan B. P.; Stanger M. J.; Belfort G.; Belfort M. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 11005– 11010. 19541659 PMC2708771
- Lockless S. W.; Muir T. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106, 10999– 11004. 19541616 PMC2708728
- Shemella P. T.; Topilina N. I.; Soga I.; Pereira B.; Belfort G.; Belfort M.; Nayak S. K. Biophys. J. 2011, 100, 2217– 2225. 21539790 PMC3149237
- Shah N. H.; Dann G. P.; Vila-Perelló M.; Liu Z.; Muir T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 11338– 11341. 22734434 PMC3535263
- Cheriyan M.; Pedamallu C. S.; Tori K.; Perler F. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 6202– 6211. 23306197 PMC3585056
- Pietrokovski S. Trends Genet. 2001, 17, 465– 472. 11485819
- Vila-Perelló M.; Muir T. W. Cell 2010, 143, 191– 200. 20946979 PMC3004290
- Caspi J.; Amitai G.; Belenkiy O.; Pietrokovski S. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 1569– 1577. 14651639 PMC7168405
- Martin D. D.; Xu M. Q.; Evans T. C. Biochemistry 2001, 40, 1393– 1402. 11170467
- Dassa B.; Amitai G.; Caspi J.; Schueler-Furman O.; Pietrokovski S. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 322– 330. 17198403
- Zettler J.; Schütz V.; Mootz H. D. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 909– 914. 19302791
- Dhar T.; Mootz H. D. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 3063– 3065. 21234473
- Borra R.; Dong D.; Elnagar A. Y.; Woldemariam G. A.; Camarero J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 6344– 6353. 22404648 PMC3324671
- Vila-Perelló M.; Liu Z.; Shah N. H.; Willis J. A.; Idoyaga J.; Muir T. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 286– 292. 23265282 PMC3544275
- Busche A. E. L.; Aranko A. S.; Talebzadeh-Farooji M.; Bernhard F.; Dötsch V.; Iwaï H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 6128– 6131. 19591176
- Muona M.; Aranko A. S.; Raulinaitis V.; Iwaï H. Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5, 574– 587. 20203672
- Jagadish K.; Borra R.; Lacey V.; Majumder S.; Shekhtman A.; Wang L.; Camarero J. A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3126– 3131. PMC3767473 23322720
- Zhang Y.; Yang W.; Chen L.; Shi Y.; Li G.; Zhou N. Anal. Biochem. 2011, 417, 65– 72. 21726524
- Wong S.; Mills E.; Truong K. Protein Eng., Des. Sel. 2012, 26, 207– 213. 23223808
- Shah N. H.; Vila-Perelló M.; Muir T. W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 6511– 6515. PMC3230118 21656885
- Muir T. W.; Sondhi D.; Cole P. A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95, 6705– 6710. 9618476 PMC22605
- Frutos S.; Goger M.; Giovani B.; Cowburn D.; Muir T. W. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2010, 6, 527– 533. 20495572 PMC2889191
- Oeemig J. S.; Aranko A. S.; Djupsjöbacka J.; Heinämäki K.; Iwaï H. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 1451– 1456. 19344715
- Sun P.; Ye S.; Ferrandon S.; Evans T. C.; Xu M.-Q.; Rao Z. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 353, 1093– 1105. 16219320
- Callahan B. P.; Topilina N. I.; Stanger M. J.; Van Roey P.; Belfort M. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011, 18, 630– 633. 21460844 PMC3087850
- Chen L.; Benner J.; Perler F. B. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 20431– 20435. 10770923
- Appleby-Tagoe J. H.; Thiel I. V.; Wang Y.; Wang Y.; Mootz H. D.; Liu X.-Q. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 34440– 34447. 21832069 PMC3190829
- Sattler M.; Schleucher J.; Griesinger C. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 1999, 34, 93– 158.
- Palmer A. G.; Cavanagh J.; Wright P. E.; Rance M. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 93, 151– 170.
- Kay L. E.; Keifer P.; Saarinen T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 10663– 10665.
- Schleucher J.; Schwendinger M.; Sattler M.; Schmidt P.; Schedletzky O.; Glaser S. J.; Sørensen O. W.; Griesinger C. J. Biomol. NMR 1994, 4, 301– 306. 8019138
- Götz A. W.; Williamson M. J.; Xu D.; Poole D.; Le Grand S.; Walker R. C. J. Chem. Theory. Comput. 2012, 8, 1542– 1555. 22582031 PMC3348677
- Pettersen E. F.; Goddard T. D.; Huang C. C.; Couch G. S.; Greenblatt D. M.; Meng E. C.; Ferrin T. E. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1605– 1612. 15264254
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inteins: nature's gift to protein chemists
Shah, N. H., & Muir, T. W. (2014) · Chem. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3sc52951g · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Self-citationTornabene, P., Trapani, I., Minopoli, R., Centrulo, M., Lupo, M., de Simone, S., Tiberi, P., Dell’Aquila, F., Marrocco, E., Iodice, C., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aav4523 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Marrone, L., Marchi, P. M., & Azzouz, M. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1080/14712598.2022.2012148 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shah, N. H., Eryilmaz, E., Cowburn, D., & Muir, T. W.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Muir, Tom W.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-04-02
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 5839-5847
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- PMC
- PMC3630739
- OpenAlex
- W2019671033
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of the American Chemical Society (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
- Keywords
- split intein, protein trans-splicing, splicing kinetics, catalytic residues, protein semisynthesis, molecular dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Kinetics, Movement, Proteins, Structure-Activity Relationship, Trans-Splicing, Catalytic Domain, Exteins, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review