The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Elucidating the Breathing of the Metal–Organic Framework MIL-53(Sc) with ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Simulations and in Situ X-ray Powder Diffraction Experiments
Open accessAbstract
Ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) simulations have been used to predict structural transitions of the breathing metal-organic framework (MOF) MIL-53(Sc) in response to changes in temperature over the range 100-623 K and adsorption of CO2 at 0-0.9 bar at 196 K. The method has for the first time been shown to predict successfully both temperature-dependent structural changes and the structural response to variable sorbate uptake of a flexible MOF. AIMD employing dispersion-corrected density functional theory accurately simulated the experimentally observed closure of MIL-53(Sc) upon solvent removal and the transition of the empty MOF from the closed-pore phase to the very-narrow-pore phase (symmetry change from P2(1)/c to C2/c) with increasing temperature, indicating that it can directly take into account entropic as well as enthalpic effects. We also used AIMD simulations to mimic the CO2 adsorption of MIL-53(Sc) in silico by allowing the MIL-53(Sc) framework to evolve freely in response to CO2 loadings corresponding to the two steps in the experimental adsorption isotherm. The resulting structures enabled the structure determination of the two CO2-containing intermediate and large-pore phases observed by experimental synchrotron X-ray diffraction studies with increasing CO2 pressure; this would not have been possible for the intermediate structure via conventional methods because of diffraction peak broadening. Furthermore, the strong and anisotropic peak broadening observed for the intermediate structure could be explained in terms of fluctuations of the framework predicted by the AIMD simulations. Fundamental insights from the molecular-level interactions further revealed the origin of the breathing of MIL-53(Sc) upon temperature variation and CO2 adsorption. These simulations illustrate the power of the AIMD method for the prediction and understanding of the behavior of flexible microporous solids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Horike, S., Shimomura, S., & Kitagawa, S. (2009) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.444 · Cited by 2,486
Cited by
Galizia, M., Chi, W. S., Smith, Z. P., Merkel, T. C., Baker, R. W., & Freeman, B. D. (2017) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/acs.macromol.7b01718 · Cited by 989
Structures of Metal–Organic Frameworks with Rod Secondary Building Units
Schoedel, A., Li, M., Li, D., O’Keeffe, M., & Yaghi, O. M. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00346 · Cited by 909
Coudert, F.-X. (2015) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00046 · Cited by 528
Quantum-Chemical Characterization of the Properties and Reactivities of Metal–Organic Frameworks
Odoh, S. O., Cramer, C. J., Truhlar, D. G., & Gagliardi, L. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500551h · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, L., Mowat, J. P. S., Fairen-Jimenez, D., Morrison, C. A., Thompson, S. P., Wright, P. A., & Düren, T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-06-18
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 42
- Pages
- 15763-15773
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1972146469
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.