The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Proton–Electron Transport and Transfer in Electrocatalytic Films. Application to a Cobalt-Based O2-Evolution Catalyst
Abstract
Solar-driven electrochemical transformations of small molecules, such as water splitting and CO2 reduction, pertinent to modern energy challenges, require the assistance of catalysts preferably deposited on conducting or semiconducting surfaces. Understanding mechanisms and identifying the factors that control the functioning of such systems are required for rational catalyst optimization and improved performance. A methodology is proposed, in the framework of rotating disk electrode voltammetry, to analyze the current responses expected in the case of a semigeneral reaction scheme involving a proton-coupled catalytic reaction associated with proton-coupled electron hopping through the film as rate controlling factors in the case where there is no limitation by substrate diffusion. The predictions concern the current density vs overpotential (Tafel) plots and their dependence on buffer concentration (including absence of buffer), film thickness and rotation rate. The Tafel plots may have a variety of slopes (e.g., F/RT ln 10, F/2RT ln 10, 0) that may even coexist within the overpotential range of a single plot. We show that an optimal film thickness exists beyond which the activity of the film plateaus. Application to water oxidation by films of a cobalt-based oxidic catalyst provides a successful test of the applicability of the proposed methodology, which also provides further insight into the mechanism by which these cobalt-based films catalyze the oxidation of water. The exact nature of the kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics that have been derived from the analysis is discussed as well as their use in catalyst benchmarking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future
Chu, S., & Majumdar, A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11475 · Cited by 12,550
Photosynthetic energy conversion: natural and artificial
Barber, J. (2009) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/b802262n · Cited by 1,843
Cited by
Xiao, H., Shin, H., & Goddard, W. A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1722034115 · Cited by 555
Do, V.-H., & Lee, J.-M. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c08919 · Cited by 292
Zhang, X., Zhang, X., Xu, H., Wu, Z., Wang, H., & Liang, Y. (2017) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201606635 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Bediako, D. K., Costentin, C., Jones, E. C., Nocera, D. G., & Savéant, J.-M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2013-07-03
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 28
- Pages
- 10492-10502
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2036002125
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.