The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Correlations between Mass Activity and Physicochemical Properties of Fe/N/C Catalysts for the ORR in PEM Fuel Cell via 57Fe Mössbauer Spectroscopy and Other Techniques
Abstract
The aim of this work is to clarify the origin of the enhanced PEM-FC performance of catalysts prepared by the procedures described in Science 2009, 324, 71 and Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 416. Catalysts were characterized after a first heat treatment in argon at 1050 °C (Ar) and a second heat treatment in ammonia at 950 °C (Ar + NH3). For the NC catalysts a variation of the nitrogen precursor was also implemented. (57)Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, neutron activation analysis, and N2 sorption measurements were used to characterize all catalysts. The results were correlated to the mass activity of these catalysts measured at 0.8 V in H2/O2 PEM-FC. It was found that all catalysts contain the same FeN4-like species already found in INRS Standard (Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 11673). Among all FeN4-like species, only D1 sites, assigned to FeN4/C, and D3, assigned to N-FeN2+2 /C sites, were active for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). The difference between INRS Standard and the new catalysts is simply that there are many more D1 and D3 sites available in the new catalysts. All (Ar + NH3)-type catalysts have a much larger porosity than Ar-type catalysts, while the maximum number of their active sites is only slightly larger after a second heat treatment in NH3. The large difference in activity between the Ar-type catalysts and the Ar + NH3 ones stems from the availability of the sites to perform ORR, as many sites of the Ar-type catalysts are secluded in the material, while they are available at the surface of the Ar + NH3-type catalysts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Derived from Polyaniline, Iron, and Cobalt
Wu, G., More, K. L., Johnston, C. M., & Zelenay, P. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1200832 · Cited by 3,984
Cited by
Recent Advances in Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction
Shao, M., Chang, Q., Dodelet, J.-P., & Chenitz, R. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00462 · Cited by 3,903
Self-citationWan, X., Liu, X., Li, Y., Yu, R., Zheng, L., Yan, W., Wang, H., Xu, M., & Shui, J. (2019) · Nature Catalysis · doi:10.1038/s41929-019-0237-3 · Cited by 1,379
(2020) · doi:10.1038/s41929-020-00545-2 · Cited by 741
In situ electrochemical quantification of active sites in Fe–N/C non-precious metal catalysts
Malko, D., Kucernak, A., & Lopes, T. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13285 · Cited by 568
Wang, X., Zhang, H., Lin, H., Gupta, S., Wang, C., Tao, Z., Fu, H., Wang, T., Zheng, J., Wu, G., et al. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.042 · Cited by 482
Luo, F., Roy, A., Silvioli, L., Cullen, D. A., Zitolo, A., Sougrati, M. T., Oguz, I. C., Mineva, T., Teschner, D., Wagner, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-020-0717-5 · Cited by 426
Self-citationEngineering nanostructures of PGM-free oxygen-reduction catalysts using metal-organic frameworks
Zhang, H., Osgood, H., Xie, X., Shao, Y., & Wu, G. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.11.033 · Cited by 336
Jia, Q., Ramaswamy, N., Tylus, U., Strickland, K., Li, J., Serov, A., Artyushkova, K., Atanassov, P., Anibal, J., Gumeci, C., et al. (2016) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.03.025 · Cited by 319
Chen, Z., Jiang, S., Kang, G., Nguyen, D., Schatz, G. C., & Van Duyne, R. P. (2019) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/jacs.9b07979 · Cited by 171
Du, L., Xing, L., Zhang, G., Dubois, M., & Sun, S. (2020) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202000016 · Cited by 91
Saveleva, V. A., Ebner, K., Ni, L., Smolentsev, G., Klose, D., Zitolo, A., Marelli, E., Li, J., Medarde, M., Safonova, O. V., et al. (2021) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.202016951 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramm, U. I., Lefèvre, M., Larouche, N., Schmeisser, D., & Dodelet, J.-P.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-01-09
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 978-985
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2326050746
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
