The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low pH Electrolytic Water Splitting Using Earth-Abundant Metastable Catalysts That Self-Assemble in Situ
Abstract
Typical catalysts for the electrolysis of water at low pH are based on precious metals (Pt for the cathode and IrO2 or RuO2 for the anode). However, these metals are rare and expensive, and hence lower cost and more abundant catalysts are needed if electrolytically produced hydrogen is to become more widely available. Herein, we show that electrode-film formation from aqueous solutions of first row transition metal ions at pH 1.6 can be induced under the action of an appropriate cell bias and that in the case of cobalt voltages across the cell in excess of 2 V lead to the formation of a pair of catalysts that show functional stability for oxygen evolution and proton reduction for over 24 h. We show that these films are metastable and that if the circuit is opened, they redissolve into the electrolyte bath with concomitant O2 and H2 evolution, such that the overall Faradaic efficiency for charge into the system versus amounts of gases obtained approaches unity for both O2 and H2. This work highlights the ability of first row transition metals to mediate heterogeneous electrolytic water splitting in acidic media by exploiting, rather than trying to avoid, the natural propensity of the catalysts to dissolve at the low pHs used. This in turn we hope will encourage others to examine the promise of metastable electrocatalysts based on abundant elements for a range of reactions for which they have traditionally been overlooked on account of their perceived instability under the prevailing conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biomimetic Hydrogen Evolution: MoS 2 Nanoparticles as Catalyst for Hydrogen Evolution
Hinnemann, B., Moses, P. G., Bonde, J., Jørgensen, K. P., Nielsen, J. H., Horch, S., Chorkendorff, I., & Nørskov, J. K. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0504690 · Cited by 4,065
Nanostructured Nickel Phosphide as an Electrocatalyst for the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction
Popczun, E. J., McKone, J. R., Read, C. G., Biacchi, A. J., Wiltrout, A. M., Lewis, N. S., & Schaak, R. E. (2013) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja403440e · Cited by 2,911
Recent developments of molybdenum and tungsten sulfides as hydrogen evolution catalysts
Merki, D., & Hu, X. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c1ee01970h · Cited by 1,172
Advanced materials for improved PEMFC performance and life
Curtin, D. E., Lousenberg, R. D., Henry, T. J., Tangeman, P. C., & Tisack, M. E. (2004) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.01.023 · Cited by 786
Cited by
Earth-abundant catalysts for electrochemical and photoelectrochemical water splitting
Roger, I., Shipman, M. A., & Symes, M. D. (2017) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-016-0003 · Cited by 3,503
Self-citationVisible-light driven heterojunction photocatalysts for water splitting – a critical review
Moniz, S. J. A., Shevlin, S. A., Martin, D. J., Guo, Z.-X., & Tang, J. (2015) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c4ee03271c · Cited by 2,363
Jin, H., Wang, J., Su, D., Wei, Z., Pang, Z., & Wang, Y. (2015) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja5127165 · Cited by 1,765
Efficient and Stable Bifunctional Electrocatalysts Ni/NixMy (M = P, S) for Overall Water Splitting
Chen, G., Ma, T. Y., Liu, Z., Li, N., Su, Y., Davey, K., & Qiao, S. (2016) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201505626 · Cited by 916
Gu, Y., Chen, S., Ren, J., Jia, Y. A., Chen, C., Komarneni, S., Yang, D., & Yao, X. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b05971 · Cited by 540
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloor, L. G., Molina, P. I., Symes, M. D., & Cronin, L.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-02-18
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3304-3311
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W1969739156
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.