The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Control of Crystalline Proton-Conducting Pathways by Water-Induced Transformations of Hydrogen-Bonding Networks in a Metal–Organic Framework
Abstract
Structure-defined metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are of interest because rational design and construction allow us to develop good proton conductors or possibly control the proton conductivity in solids. We prepared a highly proton-conductive MOF (NH4)2(adp)[Zn2(ox)3]·nH2O (abbreviated to 1·nH2O, adp: adipic acid, ox: oxalate, n = 0, 2, 3) having definite crystal structures and showing reversible structural transformations among the anhydrate (1), dihydrate (1·2H2O), and trihydrate (1·3H2O) phases. The crystal structures of all of these phases were determined by X-ray crystallography. Hydrogen-bonding networks consisting of ammonium ions, water molecules, and carboxylic acid groups of the adipic acids were formed inside the two-dimensional interlayer space in hydrated 1·2H2O and 1·3H2O. The crystal system of 1 or 1·2H2O (P21/c, No. 14) was changed into that of 1·3H2O (P1̅, No. 2), depending on water content because of rearrangement of guests and acidic molecules. Water molecules play a key role in proton conduction as conducting media and serve as triggers to change the proton conductivity through reforming hydrogen-bonding networks by water adsorption/desorption processes. Proton conductivity was consecutively controlled in the range from ∼10(-12) S cm(-1) (1) to ∼10(-2) S cm(-1) (1·3H2O) by the humidity. The relationships among the structures of conducting pathways, adsorption behavior, and proton conductivity were investigated. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of the control of a crystalline proton-conducting pathway by guest adsorption/desorption to control proton conductivity using MOFs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Millward, A. R., & Yaghi, O. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0570032 · Cited by 2,876
Kreuer, K.-D., Paddison, S. J., Spohr, E., & Schuster, M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020715f · Cited by 2,187
Cited by
Applications of water stable metal–organic frameworks
Wang, C., Liu, X., Keser Demir, N., Chen, J. P., & Li, K. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00362a · Cited by 1,249
Proton-conducting crystalline porous materials
Meng, X., Wang, H.-N., Song, S.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00528d · Cited by 697
Proton Transport in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Lim, D.-W., & Kitagawa, H. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00842 · Cited by 689
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadakiyo, M., Yamada, T., Honda, K., Matsui, H., & Kitagawa, H.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-05-15
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 7701-7707
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2323546977
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.