The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
High Proton Conduction at above 100 °C Mediated by Hydrogen Bonding in a Lanthanide Metal–Organic Framework
Abstract
A lanthanide metal-organic framework (MOF) compound of the formulation [Eu2(CO3)(ox)2(H2O)2]·4H2O (1, ox = oxalate) was prepared by hydrothermal synthesis with its structure determined crystallographically. Temperature-dependent but humidity-independent high proton conduction was observed with a maximum of 2.08 × 10(-3) S cm(-1) achieved at 150 °C, well above the normal boiling point of water. Results from detailed structural analyses, comparative measurements of conductivities using regular and deuterated samples, anisotropic conductivity measurements using a single-crystal sample, and variable-temperature photoluminescence studies collectively establish that the protons furnished by the Eu(III)-bound and activated aqua ligands are the charge carriers and that the transport of proton is mediated along the crystallographic a-axis by ordered hydrogen-bonded arrays involving both aqua ligands and adjacent oxalate groups in the channels of the open framework. Proton conduction was enhanced with the increase of temperature from room temperature to about 150 °C, which can be rationalized in terms of thermal activation of the aqua ligands and the facilitated transport between aqua and adjacent oxalate ligands. A complete thermal loss of the aqua ligands occurred at about 160 °C, resulting in the disintegration of the hydrogen-bonded pathway for proton transport and a precipitous drop in conductivity. However, the structural integrity of the MOF was maintained up to 350 °C, and upon rehydration, the original structure with the hydrogen-bonded arrays was restored, and so was its high proton-conduction ability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metal-organic framework materials as catalysts
Lee, J., Farha, O. K., Roberts, J., Scheidt, K. A., Nguyen, S. T., & Hupp, J. T. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b807080f · Cited by 7,969
Kreuer, K.-D., Paddison, S. J., Spohr, E., & Schuster, M. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020715f · Cited by 2,187
Metal–organic frameworks as platforms for clean energy
Li, S.-L., & Xu, Q. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c3ee40507a · Cited by 970
Cited by
Applications of water stable metal–organic frameworks
Wang, C., Liu, X., Keser Demir, N., Chen, J. P., & Li, K. (2016) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00362a · Cited by 1,249
Proton-conducting crystalline porous materials
Meng, X., Wang, H.-N., Song, S.-Y., & Zhang, H.-J. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c6cs00528d · Cited by 697
Proton Transport in Metal–Organic Frameworks
Lim, D.-W., & Kitagawa, H. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00842 · Cited by 689
Metadata
- Authors
- Tang, Q., Liu, Y., Liu, S., He, D., Miao, J., Wang, X., Yang, G., Shi, Z., & Zheng, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2014-08-22
- Volume
- 136
- Issue
- 35
- Pages
- 12444-12449
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2319683813
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.