Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutral Bis(α-iminopyridine)metal Complexes of the First-Row Transition Ions (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Zn) and Their Monocationic Analogues: Mixed Valency Involving a Redox Noninnocent Ligand System

Lu, Connie C., Bill, Eckhard, Weyhermüller, Thomas, Bothe, Eberhard, Wieghardt, Karl·2008·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

A series of bis(alpha-iminopyridine)metal complexes featuring the first-row transition ions (Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Zn) is presented. It is shown that these ligands are redox noninnocent and their paramagnetic pi radical monoanionic forms can exist in coordination complexes. Based on spectroscopic and structural characterizations, the neutral complexes are best described as possessing a divalent metal center and two monoanionic pi radicals of the alpha-iminopyridine. The neutral M(L*)2 compounds undergo ligand-centered, one-electron oxidations generating a second series, [(L(x))2M(THF)][B(ArF)4] [where L(x) represents either the neutral alpha-iminopyridine (L)0 and/or its reduced pi radical anion (L*)-]. The cationic series comprise mostly mixed-valent complexes, wherein the two ligands have formally different redox states, (L)0 and (L*)-, and the two ligands may be electronically linked by the bridging metal atom. Experimentally, the cationic Fe and Co complexes exhibit Robin-Day Class III behavior (fully delocalized), whereas the cationic Zn, Cr, and Mn complexes belong to Class I (localized) as shown by X-ray crystallography and UV-vis spectroscopy. The delocalization versus localization of the ligand radical is determined only by the nature of the metal linker. The cationic nickel complex is exceptional in this series in that it does not exhibit any ligand mixed valency. Instead, its electronic structure is consistent with two neutral ligands (L)0 and a monovalent metal center or [(L)2Ni(THF)][B(ArF)4]. Finally, an unusual spin equilibrium for Fe(II), between high spin and intermediate spin (S(Fe) = 2 <--> S(Fe) = 1), is described for the complex [(L*)(L)Fe(THF)][B(ArF)4], which consequently is characterized by the overall spin equilibrium (S(tot) = 3/2 <--> S(tot) = 1/2). The two different spin states for Fe(II) have been characterized using variable temperature X-ray crystallography, EPR spectroscopy, zero-field and applied-field Mössbauer spectroscopy, and magnetic susceptibility measurements. Complementary DFT studies of all the complexes have been performed, and the calculations support the proposed electronic structures.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja710663n

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Lu, C. C., Bill, E., Weyhermüller, T., Bothe, E., & Wieghardt, K.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2008-02-20
Volume
130
Issue
10
Pages
3181-3197
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2011252023
Cited by
272
References
19
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.