The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stoichiometry and Physical Chemistry of Promiscuous Aggregate-Based Inhibitors
Open accessAbstract
Many false positives in early drug discovery owe to nonspecific inhibition by colloid-like aggregates of organic molecules. Despite their prevalence, little is known about aggregate concentration, structure, or dynamic equilibrium; the binding mechanism, stoichiometry with, and affinity for enzymes remain uncertain. To investigate the elementary question of concentration, we counted aggregate particles using flow cytometry. For seven aggregate-forming molecules, aggregates were not observed until the concentration of monomer crossed a threshold, indicating a "critical aggregation concentration" (CAC). Above the CAC, aggregate count increased linearly with added organic material, while the particles dispersed when diluted below the CAC. The concentration of monomeric organic molecule is constant above the CAC, as is the size of the aggregate particles. For two compounds that form large aggregates, nicardipine and miconazole, we measured particle numbers directly by flow cytometry, determining that the aggregate concentration just above the CAC ranged from 5 to 30 fM. By correlating inhibition of an enzyme with aggregate count for these two drugs, we determined that the stoichiometry of binding is about 10,000 enzyme molecules per aggregate particle. Using measured volumes for nicardipine and miconazole aggregate particles (2.1 x 10(11) and 4.7 x 10(10) A(3), respectively), computed monomer volumes, and the observation that past the CAC all additional monomer forms aggregate particles, we find that aggregates are densely packed particles. Finally, given their size and enzyme stoichiometry, all sequestered enzyme can be comfortably accommodated on the surface of the aggregate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lipinski, C. A., Lombardo, F., Dominy, B. W., & Feeney, P. J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00129-0 · Cited by 18,139
Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates
Veber, D. F., Johnson, S. R., Cheng, H.-Y., Smith, B. R., Ward, K. W., & Kopple, K. D. (2002) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm020017n · Cited by 8,420
Interpreting steep dose-response curves in early inhibitor discovery.
Shoichet, B. K. (2006) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm061103g · Cited by 304
Self-citation
Cited by
The Essential Medicinal Chemistry of Curcumin
Nelson, K. M., Dahlin, J. L., Bisson, J., Graham, J., Pauli, G. F., & Walters, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00975 · Cited by 1,956
Counting on natural products for drug design
Rodrigues, T., Reker, D., Schneider, P., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2479 · Cited by 1,250
Seven Year Itch: Pan-Assay Interference Compounds (PAINS) in 2017—Utility and Limitations
Baell, J. B., & Nissink, J. W. M. (2018) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.7b00903 · Cited by 648
A practical guide to large-scale docking
Bender, B. J., Gahbauer, S., Luttens, A., Lyu, J., Webb, C. M., Stein, R. M., Fink, E. A., Balius, T. E., Carlsson, J., Irwin, J. J., et al. (2021) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-021-00597-z · Cited by 546
Self-citationIlevbare, G. A., & Taylor, L. S. (2013) · Crystal Growth & Design · doi:10.1021/cg301679h · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Coan, K. E. D., & Shoichet, B. K.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-06-28
- Volume
- 130
- Issue
- 29
- Pages
- 9606-9612
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2016969958
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stoichiometry and Physical Chemistry of Promiscuous Aggregate-Based Inhibitors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja802977h
- The paper
- Coan, K. E. D., & Shoichet, B. K. (2008). Stoichiometry and Physical Chemistry of Promiscuous Aggregate-Based Inhibitors. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja802977h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.