The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantum Chemical Modeling of Zeolite-Catalyzed Methylation Reactions: Toward Chemical Accuracy for Barriers
Abstract
The methylation of ethene, propene, and t-2-butene by methanol over the acidic microporous H-ZSM-5 catalyst has been investigated by a range of computational methods. Density functional theory (DFT) with periodic boundary conditions (PBE functional) fails to describe the experimentally determined decrease of apparent energy barriers with the alkene size due to inadequate description of dispersion forces. Adding a damped dispersion term expressed as a parametrized sum over atom pair C(6) contributions leads to uniformly underestimated barriers due to self-interaction errors. A hybrid MP2:DFT scheme is presented that combines MP2 energy calculations on a series of cluster models of increasing size with periodic DFT calculations, which allows extrapolation to the periodic MP2 limit. Additionally, errors caused by the use of finite basis sets, contributions of higher order correlation effects, zero-point vibrational energy, and thermal contributions to the enthalpy were evaluated and added to the "periodic" MP2 estimate. This multistep approach leads to enthalpy barriers at 623 K of 104, 77, and 48 kJ/mol for ethene, propene, and t-2-butene, respectively, which deviate from the experimentally measured values by 0, +13, and +8 kJ/mol. Hence, enthalpy barriers can be calculated with near chemical accuracy, which constitutes significant progress in the quantum chemical modeling of reactions in heterogeneous catalysis in general and microporous zeolites in particular.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sierka, M., & Sauer, J. (2001) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp004081x · Cited by 149
Self-citation
Cited by
Metal–organic and covalent organic frameworks as single-site catalysts
Rogge, S. M. J., Bavykina, A., Hajek, J., Garcia, H., Olivos-Suarez, A. I., Sepúlveda-Escribano, A., Vimont, A., Clet, G., Bazin, P., Kapteijn, F., et al. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00033b · Cited by 1,077
Oxygen Defects and Surface Chemistry of Ceria: Quantum Chemical Studies Compared to Experiment
Paier, J., Penschke, C., & Sauer, J. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr3004949 · Cited by 1,075
Self-citationAdvances in theory and their application within the field of zeolite chemistry
Van Speybroeck, V., Hemelsoet, K., Joos, L., Waroquier, M., Bell, R. G., & Catlow, C. R. A. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c5cs00029g · Cited by 516
Jones, A. J., Carr, R. T., Zones, S. I., & Iglesia, E. (2014) · Journal of Catalysis · doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2014.01.007 · Cited by 265
Ab Initio Study of Hydrogen Adsorption in MOF-5
Sillar, K., Hofmann, A., & Sauer, J. (2009) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja8099079 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Svelle, S., Tuma, C., Rozanska, X., Kerber, T., & Sauer, J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-12-19
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 816-825
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2083702050
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.