The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The QTAIM Approach to Chemical Bonding Between Transition Metals and Carbocyclic Rings: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Study of (η5-C5H5)Mn(CO)3, (η6-C6H6)Cr(CO)3, and (E)-{(η5-C5H4)CF═CF(η5-C5H4)}(η5-C5H5)2Fe2
Abstract
Experimental charge densities for (C(5)H(5))Mn(CO)(3) (2), (eta(6)-C(6)H(6))Cr(CO)(3) (3), and (E)-{(eta(5)-C(5)H(4))CF=CF(eta(5)-C(5)H(4))}(eta(5)-C(5)H(5))(2)Fe(2) (4) have been obtained by multipole refinement of high-resolution X-ray diffraction data at 100 K. The resultant densities were analyzed using the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). The electronic structures of these and related pi-hydrocarbyl complexes have also been studied by ab initio density functional theory calculations, and a generally good agreement between theory and experiment with respect to the topological parameters was observed. The topological parameters indicate significant metal-ring covalency. A consistent area of disagreement concerns the topology of the metal-ring interactions. It is shown that because of the shared-shell bonding between the metal and the ring carbons, an annulus of very flat density rho and very small wedge rho is formed, which leads to topologically unstable structures close to catastrophe points. This in turn leads to unpredictable numbers of metal-C bond paths for ring sizes greater than four and fewer M-C bond paths than expected on the basis of the formal hapticity. This topological instability is a general feature of metal-pi-hydrocarbyl interactions and means that a localized approach based on individual M-C(ring) bond paths does not provide a definitive picture of the chemical bonding in these systems. However, other QTAIM indicators, such as the virial paths, the delocalization indices, and the source function, clearly demonstrate that for the n-hapto (eta(n)-C(n)H(n))M unit, there is generally a very similar level of chemical bonding for all M-C(ring) interactions, as expected on the basis of chemical experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.37-0940 · Cited by 14,314
Cited by
Popov, A. A., Yang, S., & Dunsch, L. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300297r · Cited by 1,256
Kaltsoyannis, N. (2013) · Inorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ic3006025 · Cited by 356
Metadata
- Authors
- Farrugia, L. J., Evans, C., Lentz, D., & Roemer, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2008-12-22
- Volume
- 131
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1251-1268
- ISSN
- 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-5126
- OpenAlex
- W2086376616
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.