Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Parameters Influencing the Efficiency of Electron Injection in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Koops, Sara E., O’Regan, Brian C., Barnes, Piers R. F., Durrant, James R.·2009·Journal of the American Chemical Society

Abstract

In this paper we focus upon the electron injection dynamics in complete nanocrystalline titanium dioxide dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) employing the ruthenium bipyridyl sensitizer dye N719. Electron injection dynamics and quantum yields are studied by time-resolved single photon counting, and the results are correlated with device performance. In typical DSSC devices, electron injection kinetics were found to proceed from the N719 triplet state with a half-time of 200 +/- 60 ps and quantum yield of 84 +/- 5%. We find that these injection dynamics are independent of presence of iodide/triiodide redox couple and of the pH of the peptization step used in the synthesis of the TiO(2) nanoparticles. They are furthermore found to be only weakly dependent upon the application of electrical bias to the device. In contrast, we find these dynamics to be strongly dependent upon the concentration of tert-butylpyridine (tBP) and lithium cations in the electrolyte. This dependence is correlated with shifts of the TiO(2) conduction band energetics as a function of tBP and Li(+) concentration, from which we conclude that a 100 meV shift in band edge results in an approximately 2-fold retardation of injection dynamics. We find that the electron injection quantum yield determined from these transient emission data as a function of tBP and Li(+) concentration shows a linear correlation with device short circuit density J(sc). We thus conclude that the relative energetics of the dye excited state versus the titanium dioxide acceptor state is a key determinant of the dynamics of electron injection in DSSC, and that variations in these energetics, and therefore in the kinetics and efficiency of electron injection, impact directly upon device photovoltaic efficiency. Finally, we discuss these results in terms of singlet versus triplet electron injection pathways and the concept of minimization of kinetic redundancy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/ja8091278

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 601

Metadata

Authors
Koops, S. E., O’Regan, B. C., Barnes, P. R. F., & Durrant, J. R.
Venue
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Published
2009-03-12
Volume
131
Issue
13
Pages
4808-4818
ISSN
  • 0002-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5126
OpenAlex
W2085336591
Cited by
601
References
34
FWCI
27.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parameters Influencing the Efficiency of Electron Injection in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1021/ja8091278
The paper
Koops, S. E., O’Regan, B. C., Barnes, P. R. F., & Durrant, J. R. (2009). Parameters Influencing the Efficiency of Electron Injection in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Journal of the American Chemical Society. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja8091278

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.